Re: SOAP 1.2 [was Fifth interop meeting]
- --- In soapbuilders@y..., Rich Salz <r.salz@v...> wrote:
> > SOAP 1.2, not merely SOAP 1.1services recast to a SOAP 1.2syntax. Mark
> > Baker  has indicated that he believes the "Web Method Feature"to be the
> > major architectural difference between SOAP 0.9/1.0/1.1 and SOAP1.2.
> I agree that it is probably the biggest change.
> But I don't care. It's a political sop to a bunch of REST hoi
> Or, as commercial folks might call it, "a check-box item."SwA.
> I'd much rather see effort on the simple and obvious stuff, and
> Those are more real-world than send GET get back soap xml."Its in the spec, its ten lines of code, just bloody write it!"
- Sam Ruby
- My schema had a typo:
<element name="Invoice" type="tns:InvoiceType"
Should be PoReferenceType
Also, we shold probably add an "Email" link to SimpleAddressType:
<element name="Name" type="string"/>
<element name="Street" type="string"/>
<!-- Locality is all other addressing info. -->
<element name="Locality" type="string"/>
<element name="EMail" type="anyURI"/>
Any comments? Judging by lack of reaction so far, perhaps folks aren't
interested in testing HTTP GET and SOAP? :)