Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [soapbuilders] WSDL schemas update

Expand Messages
  • Kirill Gavrylyuk
    I see - sure, I don t think there is any problem with reverting it back. Does everybody concur that schema for definitions element should be reverted back to
    Message 1 of 10 , Feb 4, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      I see - sure, I don't think there is any problem with reverting it back.
      Does everybody concur that schema for definitions element should be
      reverted back to <sequence>?
      Thanks


      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: Matt Long [mailto:mlong@...]
      > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 PM
      > To: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [soapbuilders] WSDL schemas update
      >
      >
      > Kirill,
      >
      > That's going to break some ppl who developed on the literal
      > definition of sequence (children of definitions) in the
      > previous schema.
      >
      > Thx,
      >
      > -Matt Long
      > Phalanx Systems, LLC
      >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: Kirill Gavrylyuk [mailto:kirillg@...]
      > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:22 PM
      > > To: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: RE: [soapbuilders] WSDL schemas update
      > >
      > >
      > > Hi, Simon!
      > > We felt that spec wording does not limit the order of definitions
      > > children. So we put a sequence of choice elements to allow
      > any order.
      > > What do people think about it?
      > >
      > > Thanks.
      > >
      > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > From: Simon Fell [mailto:soap@...]
      > > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:08 PM
      > > > To: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: Re: [soapbuilders] WSDL schemas update
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:19:32 -0800, in soap you wrote:
      > > >
      > > > >Hi, all!
      > > > >Following community demand for updating WSDL schemas to
      > > > Recommendation
      > > > >version of XML Schema, schemas were updated at the following
      > > > locations:
      > > > >
      > > > >Wsdl.xsd - http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/
      > > > >Wsdl-mime.xsd - http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/
      > > > >Wsdl-http.xsd - http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/
      > > > >Wsdl-soap.xsd - http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/
      > > > >
      > > > >Schemas were also fixed in couple places to match verbiage
      > > > of the WSDL
      > > > >spec. They were reviewed and approved by spec authors.
      > > Please take a
      > > > >look and tell us if there are any problems.
      > > > >
      > > > >Thank you.
      > > >
      > > > Earlier versions of the schema used a sequence for the
      > > > definitions element, now its a repeating choice, was there a
      > > > specific reason to go away from requiring the elements in
      > > > definitions to be in a specific order ?
      > > >
      > > > Tx
      > > > Simon
      > > > www.pocketsoap.com
      > > >
      > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
      > > > ---------------------~--> Sponsored by VeriSign - The Value
      > > > of Trust Secure all your Web servers now - with a proven
      > > > 5-part strategy. The FREE Server Security Guide shows you
      > > > how. http://us.click.yahoo.com/iWSNbC/VdiDAA/yigFAA/W6uqlB/TM
      > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
      > > > -------~->
      > > >
      > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
      > > > This group is a forum for builders of SOAP implementations to
      > > > discuss implementation and interoperability issues. Please
      > > > stay on-topic.
      > > >
      > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > > soapbuilders-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
      > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
      > > ---------------------~-->
      > > Sponsored by VeriSign - The Value of Trust
      > > Do you need to encrypt all your online transactions? Find
      > > the perfect solution in this FREE Guide from VeriSign.
      > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/jWSNbC/UdiDAA/yigFAA/W6uqlB/TM
      > > --------------------------------------------------------------
      > > -------~->
      > >
      > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
      > > This group is a forum for builders of SOAP implementations to
      > > discuss implementation and interoperability issues. Please
      > > stay on-topic.
      > >
      > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > soapbuilders-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
      > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.