Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [soapbuilders] qualified names in structs

Expand Messages
  • Matt Long
    Thanks Bob, We as builders we failed this test in a substantial way, only a 3 threw faults. -Matt ... http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ... This group is a
    Message 1 of 3 , Jul 27, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      Thanks Bob,

      We as "builders" we failed this test in a substantial way, only a 3 threw
      faults.

      -Matt




      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: Bob Cunnings [mailto:cunnings@...]
      > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 1:24 PM
      > To: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [soapbuilders] qualified names in structs
      >
      >
      > Hello,
      >
      > 1) If you meant "contained types", then yes, I think so, as type
      > "SOAPStruct" is defined with unqualified names given to its
      > member accessors, i.e. they are locally scoped.
      >
      > 2) The names of array items themselves are insignificant, so the
      > names of the *struct* elements in the array of struct wouldn't
      > matter. It's a different matter, of course, for the struct's member
      > accessors.
      >
      > RC
      >
      > > Sec 5.4.1 states...[2]
      > > ..."Accessors whose names are local to their containing types have
      > > unqualified element names; all others have qualified names.
      > >
      > > 1) Would this indicate in the echoStruct test that *if*
      > (see below) the
      > > struct's containing types have qualified names then a fault
      > should occur?
      > >
      > > 2) An array is a compound value, e.g., if one composes an
      > array of structs
      > > (another compound value) then should the element names of
      > the items in the
      > > array, i.e., the structs, not have qualified names?
      > >
      > >
      > > Running this test...where xmlns:sx="http://somewhere.org/"
      > > <inputStruct xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct">
      > > <sx:varString xsi:type="xsd:string">easy test</sx:varString>
      > > <sx:varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">11</sx:varInt>
      > > <sx:varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">22.33</sx:varFloat>
      > > </inputStruct>
      > >
      > >
      > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383519
      > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383520
      > >
      > >
      > > -Matt
      > >
      > >
      > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
      > > This group is a forum for builders of SOAP implementations
      > to discuss implementation and interoperability issues.
      > Please stay on-topic.
      > >
      > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > soapbuilders-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
      http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >
      >




      -----------------------------------------------------------------
      This group is a forum for builders of SOAP implementations to discuss
      implementation and interoperability issues. Please stay on-topic.

      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      soapbuilders-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.