Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [soapbuilders] Re: Simple Type SOAP Headers

Expand Messages
  • Simon Fell
    ahhh, here s the pointer to when i last tried this http://www.dotnet247.com/247reference/msgs/7/36948.aspx cheers Simon
    Message 1 of 5 , Aug 11, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      ahhh, here's the pointer to when i last tried this
      http://www.dotnet247.com/247reference/msgs/7/36948.aspx

      cheers
      Simon

      On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:14:59 -0000, in ws you wrote:

      >That's a good point. I'd say its valid, although it doesn't account
      >for everything. (a request which is valid to the schema is a valid
      >request)
      >
      >You could also just allow the specific soap attrbiutes.
      >
      ><xs:complexType name="HeaderDateTimeType">
      > <xs:simpleContent>
      > <xs:extension base="xs:dateTime">
      > </xs:simpleContent>
      > <xs:attribute ref="soap:actor" />
      > <xs:attribute ref="soap:mustUnderstand" />
      ></xs:complexType>
      ><xs:element name="ValidFrom" type="tns:HeaderDateTimeType"/>
      >
      >I remeber doing this a couple of years ago, and it caused havoc with
      >every toolkit that tried to process it.
      >
      >or this, which is essentially the same as above, but probably less
      >likely to trip up the tools.
      >
      ><xs:complexType name="HeaderDateTimeType">
      > <xs:simpleContent>
      > <xs:extension base="xs:dateTime">
      > <xs:anyAttribute
      >namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
      >processContents="strict" />
      > </xs:extension>
      > </xs:simpleContent>
      > </xs:complexType>
      ><xs:element name="ValidFrom" type="tns:HeaderDateTimeType"/>
      >
      >
      >Do any of the tools that generate WSDL do this?
      >
      >Cheers
      >Simon
      >
      >--- In soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com, "Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@m...>
      >wrote:
      >> Hi Simon,
      >> .Net 1.1 behavior aside, this is an interesting issue, that I don't
      >> think was discussed a lot (surprisingly).
      >>
      >> I do not believe that test_1header.wsdl at [1] is valid.
      >>
      >> The declaration of element tns:ValidFrom does not allow for SOAP
      >> attributes. Element tns:ValidForm per WSDL spec will be used literally
      >> in the message.
      >>
      >> I believe if you want to declare a header carrying a primitive type
      >> values, at minimum you need to open up the attribute content.
      >>
      >> E.g.
      >> <xs:complexType name="HeaderDateTimeType">
      >> <xs:simpleContent>
      >> <xs:extension base="xs:dateTime">
      >> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax" />
      >> </xs:extension>
      >> </xs:simpleContent>
      >> </xs:complexType>
      >> <xs:element name="ValidFrom" type="tns:HeaderDateTimeType"/>
      >>
      >> Thoughts?
      >>
      >>
      >> -----Original Message-----
      >> From: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com]
      >> On Behalf Of Simon Fell
      >> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:33 AM
      >> To: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com
      >> Subject: [soapbuilders] Simple Type SOAP Headers
      >>
      >> I ran into some issues with SOAP Headers that are simple types when
      >> using .NET 1.1. I documented the issues here
      >> http://www.pocketsoap.com/weblog/2005/08/1557.html
      >>
      >> I was wondering how the other stacks handle this situation, there are
      >> test WSDLs in the blog post if anyone has time to try out their own
      >> stacks with them.
      >>
      >> Thanks!
      >> Simon
      >> www.pocketsoap.com
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
      >> This group is a forum for builders of SOAP implementations to discuss
      >> implementation and interoperability issues. Please stay on-topic.
      >> Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >-----------------------------------------------------------------
      >This group is a forum for builders of SOAP implementations to discuss implementation and interoperability issues. Please stay on-topic.
      >Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.