8297Re: [soapbuilders] Round IV Action Items
- Aug 2, 2002Hi,
Regarding GET testing...
I see two options here:
a) retrofit existing published interop test endpoints with the new
feature as you suggest, using the same URI for POST and GET,
perhaps returning endpoint metadata as you suggest.
b) define a new interop service for the purpose, using new
endpoints, perhaps something of a "conversational" nature.
It may be as much a question of convenience as anything, I can
only say that for myself I have no preference, either option would
work (I hope to have the existing WM endpoints supporting SOAP
1.2 LC in a few days).
> Simon Fell wrote:
> > Perhaps we should set a deadline for various test owners to publish
> > their test documents ?
> Is there anything I can do to help advance GET testing? For anyone who
> didn't see it, I made a proposal that I meant to be pretty simple,
> doable and hopefully uncontroversial:
> * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soapbuilders/message/8203
> I'm not sure what the process is to move forward on it or discard it if
> it isn't appropriate.
> XML, Web Services Architecture, REST Architectural Style
> Consulting, training, programming: http://www.constantrevolution.com
> Come discuss XML and REST web services at the Extreme Markup Conference
- << Previous post in topic