7Re: [soapbuilders] WSDL and method names
- Jan 31, 2001
> > On a slightly different note, while i was working on the WSDLWhen we were implementing our WSDL parser for our stub-generating
> > generator for 4s4c, i tried various WSDL toolkits, and in
> > particular i
> > tried doing some array / complex type inter-op, and i couldn't get
> > of them to work cross-tool for arrays or complex types.
> Right, there (at least in SOAP::Lite) is no support for arrays and
> complex types. I don't want to implements it before I'll have clear
> understanding how to map it to user input.
tools, we decided to go with some subset of XML Scheme that seemed to
describe the complex types the best.
> > I'd like to propose that we workup some well documented examples ofAttached is our demo WSDL description where we use both structures
> > what WSDL should look like, and try and resolve some of the
> > outstanding issues that Tony Hong has already raised (which part of
> > WSDL controls the method names / responses, one way vs empty
> > response etc )
> It would be great! Who will take the lead? Author? :))
and arrays. Comments welcome. 8-)
This WSDL description is parsable with version 1.0 of IdooXoap and
describes a (very demo-ish) service at our server soap.idoox.net. I
can post example requests sent by stubs generated from this WSDL so
that you know how we interpret the WSDL description.
I already know about one thing that we fixed after 1.0 that is
probably a problem with our understanding of WSDL, it's the body
element's namespace that isn't being put there in 1.0.
I think this might be a good starting point for creating that
well-documented example WSDL.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>