5435RE: [soapbuilders] Sparse Array w/ Duplicates
- Oct 1, 2001hi rich,
My recollection from the opinion in  is that duplicates are not allowed.
This is not standardized across the framework, which is an issue that needs
to be addressed, imo.
A) Allow duplicates
B) Fault on duplicates
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsalz@... [mailto:rsalz@...]
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:44 AM
> To: Matt Long
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [soapbuilders] Sparse Array w/ Duplicates
> Is it more likely to be a sender BUG or proper behavior if a
> serialization "overwrites" elements?
> How many times, for example, does Perl's "keys" iterating over a
> dictionary, or Python's "in" or "items" iterating, or a VisualBasic
> Enumeration -- how often are they likely to get repeats?
> Yes, I am sure it is POSSIBLE that some implementation will find it
> efficient to be able to REPLACE elements. But it is much
> more likely a
> bug, and a server is better off rejecting such a message.
> Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity
> Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>