Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [smygo] Can Anarchists Get It Together?

Expand Messages
  • stevphen shukaitis
    uhm . . . part of the confusion here is the Dan, great guy he is, unlike how your message indicates - did not write this write aricle. It was written by some
    Message 1 of 4 , Feb 3, 2003
      uhm . . . part of the confusion here is the Dan, great guy he is, unlike
      how your message indicates - did not write this write aricle. It was
      written by some journalist - and the presuppositions and stances it takes
      have to be considered from that persepctive. So, although the points you
      make are valid - they should be directed at the aformentioned journalist -
      and not Mr. Clore, who didn't write this article.


      > Dan wrote:
      > "But where the smashed window or street fight is what makes
      > the television screens, anarchism as a philosophy does not
      > require violence. For every smashed window, there are a
      > dozen or more meetings about the fine points of collective
      > decision-making and regional democracy."
      > I think you may be getting confused over the word 'violence' here. 
      > As I understand it, it is not contrary to anarchist principles to smash
      > windows.  Nor is such action truly 'violent'.  Violence
      > against people IS contrary to the principles of anarchism, since such
      > action is undemocratic.  In anarchism, people must be given
      > freedom, and violence against persons takes away such freedom. 
      > Thus, street fighting is authoritarian and thus non-anarchist.  On
      > the other hand, institutions must be questioned, and if found wanting,
      > the harmful creations of such institutions should be destroyed or
      > otherwise changed and put to good use.  That challenge and the
      > resulting action is at the heart of anarchism.  As an anarchist,
      > and thus by definition a pacifist, I would see no contradiction between
      > my pacifism and the breaking of (for example) a McDonalds restaurant
      > window.  Such action is (in my view) nonviolent.  In my
      > opinion the institution and its creations are inherently unjust and
      > unhealthy.  I would not engage in such destruction myself, nor
      > would I advocate it, since I think there are more intelligent ways of
      > getting rid of the institution and replacing it with something better,
      > but I do see a need to let other anarchists express themselves in
      > whatever way they see fit, as long as it is non-authoritarian and
      > non-oppressive.  Certainly, the breaking of a McDonalds window
      > serves to highlight the issue.  The question then, is not so much
      > whether such action is by its nature contrary to anarchism - the
      > question becomes whether breaking an institution's window is likely to
      > harm or oppress those who depend on the institution for their
      > livelihood, and whether such action is a productive way of advertising
      > anarchism to the general public.  I tend to think that, in the case
      > of McDonalds, the corporation and its employees will not be unduly
      > affected by such actions in the long run, so such action can be
      > justified if one accepts that view, although that also me ans that such
      > action on the part of anarchists is useless in the long term. Also, such
      > actions tend to generate sympathy for the corporation in the minds of
      > those who don't appreciate the harm that the corporation does. 
      > Thus, although it may be justified, in the present political and social
      > climate such anarchist action is both useless and counter-productive.
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > smygo-unsubscribe@egroups.com
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

      - www.DualPower.net - a mutual aid network of ideas and information for
      activists and community organizers to facilitate the usage of dual power
      strategies in creating positive social change -

      -contact: liberation@... -

      - "We have no interest in abilities apart from the revolutionary use that
      can be made of them, a use that acquires its sense in everyday life . . .
      In other words, every revolutionary must at the very least have the
      passion to defend his most precious attribute: his passion for individual
      realization, his desire to liberate his own everyday life."
      -Raoul Veneigem, from "To Have as a Goal Practical Truth" -

      "We are going to inherit the earth, there is not the slightest doubt about
      that. The bourgeoisie might blast and ruin its own world before it leaves
      the stage of history. We carry a new world, here, in our hearts. That
      world is growing this minute." -
      - Buenventura Durruti speaking to the Toronto Star
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.