News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo

http://clongenecker.wordpress.com/2012/07/12/anarchists-and-the-occupy-movement/
Anarchists and the Occupy Movement
Posted by clongenecker on July 12, 2012

While it has been widely written and discussed that Occupy Wall Street
and the broader Occupy movement are at their core, fundamentally
anarchist projects, very little has been written from the inside about
the experiences of activists and organizers working under the Occupy
banner who identify as such. While Occupy tends to operate on core
anarchist structures and principles, and many of the initial organizers
of OWS were indeed self-identified anarchists, the movement is losing
its most experienced and radical elements at a rapid pace and many
Occupy encampments and assemblies never had an experienced anarchist
core to begin with.

These factors have led to a situation where many newly-identified,
inexperienced anarchists, as well as others who do not identify as such,
are using the tools of anarchy, such as consensus, horizontality and
direct action, with no foundation for their application, or mentors to
help them learn. The Occupy movement must recognize how it is
marginalizing one of its most valuable resources and reverse this talent
drain if it is to survive as a radical movement opposed to the state and
capitalism, and in support of community self-determination and liberation.

Why didn’t local, existing anarchist communities get involved in Occupy
in many cities? Why are they now leaving Occupy Wall Street in droves?
What do these organizers bring to the table, and why do we need them?

The modern anarchist movement has, at its core, a deep commitment to
anti-oppression work. This means recognizing that it is not just the
government and capitalism that oppresses us, but an interconnected web
that strikes at the soul of every individual differently. Patriarchy,
racism, homophobia, transphobia, sexism and ablism all work in tandem
with capitalism and the state to preserve the existing white
supremacist, male-dominated, heteronormative culture those institutions
require to thrive. Therefore, a huge part of the work of the anarchists
is to attempt to unlearn the rotten socialization of this culture, and
to create “safer spaces” where systemically marginalized folks can feel
safer to live, work and organize.

On a whole, Occupy has done a pretty lousy job at this. The Safer Spaces
Working Group at OWS was consistently marginalized and ignored.
Patriarchy and white supremacy reared its head constantly, as white male
organizers were consistently given more credibility than female
organizers or organizers of color. As a result, many of our most
experienced queer, female-identified and organizers of color dropped out
in the first few months of Occupy Wall Street and a trickling loss of
talent continues to this day.

In Occupy New Orleans, where I lived and organized for a little over two
weeks, a group of experienced anarchist organizers (majority
female-identified people of color) who helped start the occupation were
pushed out by a group of predominantly white male “anarchists” who would
loudly disrupt general assembly and mock the women of color facilitating.

Eventually, this group successfully pushed out the experienced
anarchists; they stopped participating in the project. The conflict
started because the one group were completely resistant to acknowledging
white privilege or patriarchy, were infuriated at the women of color who
brought up these concepts, and then used all of their privilege to
launch verbal and physical assaults until they had won some kind of
twisted power-struggle. When, weeks later, my female partner and I
attempted to have a quiet, civil conversation with them about the
importance of these concepts, she left in tears after being screamed at
by a hulking, shirtless man who loudly proclaimed her to be a “cunt”.

Perhaps just as responsible for the drain of experienced anarchist
organizers as the lack of safer spaces is the constant struggle against
co-optation from external forces and the infighting with one another.

Many of our most experienced organizers spend far too much of their time
deflecting perceived co-optation threats from progressive groups like
Move On, liberal front groups like “99% Solidarity” and the “Movement
Resource Group” or labor unions. While these more institutional,
hierarchically organized groups have certainly tried their hardest to
steer Occupy towards single-issue, reformist, or electoral focuses, we
can most effectively combat them by defining who we really are through
our actions and example. The thousands of person-hours wasted in
conversations with these groups, and with one another about them, has
certainly hurt our focus more than their actual attempts did, and these
interactions led directly to the burnout and abandonment of Occupy by
many of our most experienced and radical organizers.

Additionally, all too often in Occupy groups, the general assembly and
other consensus tools are not used to build trust and mutual respect,
but rather function as legislatures, with various factions vying for
control and pushing their agendas. A truly effective mass movement must
operate like a giant squid, whose tentacles reach in many directions
with many goals and tactics, but all in solidarity with each other. A
true diversity of tactics. The imposition of such authoritarian,
anti-anarchist concepts as demands, centralization and peace pledges has
also attributed to the loss of much talent in this movement, even in its
infant stage.

In Austin, TX, I stayed at the home of a community of anarchists who had
been pushed out of Occupy Austin on the very first night of their
encampment. Their crime had been the raising of a single tent, in
defiance of the “deal” struck between the more reform-minded organizers
who had negotiated with City Hall in exchange for a temporary, legal and
purely symbolic encampment there. They were met with verbal assaults,
physical abuse and attempts to literally destroy the tent in question.
Instead of organizing with Occupy, these anti-authoritarians used their
energy to help create a structure for local anarchists in the city to
cooperate and work together, being in solidarity with one another
despite differences in tactics and strategy.

Experienced anarchists have much to offer the Occupy movement. They
understand the tools of consensus intimately, as many have been
practicing them in their homes and on their projects for years. In many
cases, they are already self-organized into affinity groups that can
pull off secure, instrumental direct actions when needed. They are
committed to the task of social revolution that Occupy espouses, and are
often students of previous emancipatory social movements. They have, for
quite some time, been creating the structures of dual-power that Occupy
will require to survive, working on projects like Food Not Bombs,
Really, REALLY Free Markets, community centers, infoshops and collective
houses. Many have helped organize mass mobilizations during the Global
Justice movement of the 00’s that actually shut down summits and
gatherings of the economic and political elite, a lineage that Occupy,
with its mostly symbolic days of action, could certainly learn from.
Many have been involved in the environment resistance movement, and have
a plethora of advanced skills and tactics for resistance, such as
lock-downs, tree-sits, tripods and equipment disruption, that many urban
Occupy activists have no experience with.

This piece is meant not to cause further division, but rather as a
humble contribution to what will hopefully become a healing and
reconciliation process. Occupy is among the most powerful and
well-positioned social justice movements of our time, and it would truly
be a shame if many of the folks most committed to and experienced with
these principles and their application, continued to either not be
involved at all, or to feel pushed out and leave. If our movement is to
grow, we must learn to create safer spaces for systemically marginalized
organizers and activists to work and thrive in. We must respect and be
in solidarity with one another despite our unique backgrounds and
tactics for resistance. I like to think that the history of anarchists
and Occupy is still largely unwritten, and I am more convinced than ever
that we need each other to create a true alternative to the state and
capitalism.


--
Dan Clore

New book: _Weird Words: A Lovecraftian Lexicon_:
http://tinyurl.com/yd3bxkw
My collected fiction: _The Unspeakable and Others_
http://tinyurl.com/3tyj9cq
Lord Weÿrdgliffe & Necronomicon Page:
http://tinyurl.com/292yz9
News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo

Skipper: Professor, will you tell these people who is
in charge on this island?
Professor: Why, no one.
Skipper: No one?
Thurston Howell III: No one? Good heavens, this is anarchy!
-- _Gilligan's Island_, episode #6, "President Gilligan"