Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
  • FirefoxUpgrade to the new Firefox »

    ::: Flaxscrip & Hempscrip :::

    Expand Messages
    • DanC
      ... by Robert Shea & Robert Anton Wilson Flaxscrip was first introduced into Discordian groups by the mysterious Malaclypse the Younger, K.S.C., in 1968.
      Message 1 of 3 , Apr 13, 2011
      • 0 Attachment
        ::: Flaxscrip & Hempscrip :::

        by Robert Shea & Robert Anton Wilson

        Flaxscrip was first introduced into Discordian groups by the mysterious
        Malaclypse the Younger, K.S.C., in 1968. Hempscrip followed the year
        after, issued by Dr. Mordecai Malignatus, K.N.S. (In the novel, taking
        one of our few liberties with historical truth, we move these coinages
        backward in time and attribute hempscrip to the Justified Ancients of
        Mummu.)

        The *idea* behind flaxscrip, of course, is as old as history; there was
        private money long before there was government money. The first
        revolutionary (or reformist) use of this idea, as a check against
        galloping usury and high interest rates, was the foundation of "Banks of
        Piety" by the Dominican order of the Catholic Church in the late middle
        ages. (See Tawney, _Religion and the Rise of Capitalism_.) The
        Dominicans, having discovered that preaching against usury did not deter
        the usurer, founded their own banks and provided loans without interest;
        this "ethical competition" (as Josiah Warren later called it) drove the
        commercial banks out of the areas where the Dominicans practiced it.
        Similar private currency, loaned at a low rate of interest (but not at
        no interest), was provided by Scots banks until the British government,
        acting on behalf of the monopoly of the Bank of England, stopped this
        exercise of free enterprise. (See Muellen, _Free Banking_.) The same
        idea was tried successfully in the American colonies before the
        Revolution, and again was suppressed by the British government, which
        some heretical historians regard as a more direct cause of the American
        Revolution than the taxes mentioned in most schoolbooks. (See Ezra
        Pound, _Impact_, and additional sources cited therein.)

        During the nineteenth century many anarchists and individualists
        attempted to issue low-interest or no-interest private currencies.
        _Mutual Banking_, by Colonel William Greene, and _True Civilization_, by
        Josiah Warren, are records of two such attempts, by their instigators.
        Lysander Spooner, an anarchist who was also a constitutional lawyer,
        argued at length that Congress had no authority to suppress such private
        currencies (see his _Our Financiers: Their Ignorance, Usurpations and
        Frauds_). A general overview of such efforts at free enterprise, soon
        crushed by the Capitalist State, is given by James M. Martin in his _Men
        Against the State_, and by Rudolph Rocker in _Pioneers of American
        Freedom_ (an ironic title, since his pioneers all lost their major
        battles). Lawrence Labadie, of Suffern, N.Y., has collected (but not yet
        published) records of 1,000 such experiments; one of the present
        authors, Robert Anton Wilson, unearthed in 1962 the tale of a
        no-interest currency, privately issued, in Yellow Springs, Ohio, during
        the 1930s depression. (This was an emergency measure by certain local
        businessmen, who did not fully appreciate the principle involved, and
        was abandoned as soon as the "tight-money" squeeze ended and Roosevelt
        began flooding us all with Federal Reserve notes.)

        It is traditional among liberal historians to dismiss such endeavors as
        "funny-money schemes." They have never explained why government money is
        any less hilarious. (That used in the U.S. now [1975], for instance, is
        actually worth 47 percent of its "declared" face value). All money is
        funny, if you stop to think about it, but no private currency, competing
        on a free market, could ever be quite so comical (and tragic) as the
        notes now bearing the magic imprint of Uncle Sam -- and backed only by
        his promise (or threat) that, come hell or high water, by God he'll make
        it good by taxing our descendants into the infinite generation to pay
        the interest on it. The National Debt, so called, is of course, nothing
        else but the debt we owe the bankers who "loaned" this money to Uncle
        after he kindly gave them the credit which enabled them to make this
        loan. Hempscrip or even acidscrip or peyotescrip could never be quite so
        clownish as this system, which only the Illuminati (if they really
        exist) could have dreamed up. The system has but one advantage: It makes
        bankers richer every year. Nobody else, from the industrial capitalist
        or "captain of industry" to the coal-miner, profits from it in any way,
        and all pay the taxes, which become the interest payments, which makes
        the bankers richer. If the Illuminati did not exist, it would be
        necessary to invent them -- such a system can be explained in no other
        way, except by those cynics who hold that human stupidity is infinite.

        The idea behind hempscrip is more radical than the notion of
        private-enterprise currency per se. Hempscrip, as employed in the novel,
        depreciates; it is, thus, not merely a *no-interest* currency, but a
        *negative-interest* currency. The lender literally pays the borrower to
        take it away for a while. It was invented by German business-economist
        Silvio Gesell, and is described in his _Natural Economic Order_ and in
        professor Irving Fisher's _Stamp Script_.

        Gresham's Law, like most of the "laws" taught in State-supported public
        schools, is not quite true (at least, not in the form in which it is
        usually taught). *"Bad money drives out good" holds only in
        authoritarian societies, not in libertarian societies.* (Gresham was
        clear-minded enough to state explicitly that he was only describing
        authoritarian societies: *his* formulation of his own "Law" begins with
        the words "If the king issueth two moneys ...," thereby implying the
        State must exist if the "Law" is to operate.) *In a libertarian society,
        good money will drive out the bad.* This Utopian proposition -- which
        the sane reader will regard with acute skepticism -- has been seen to be
        sound by a rigorously logical demonstration, based on the axioms of
        economics, in _The Cause of Business Depressions_ by Hugo Bilgrim and
        Edward Levy.

        [footnote]
        Economists can "prove" all sorts of things from axioms and few of them
        turn out to be true. Yes. We saved for a footnote the information that
        at least four empirical demonstrations of the reverse of Gresham's Law
        are on record. Three of them, employing small volunteer communities in
        frontier U.S.A. circa 1830-1860, are recorded in Josiah Warren's _True
        Civilization_. The fourth, employing contemporary college students in a
        psychology laboratory, is the subject of a recent Master's thesis by
        associate professor Don Werkheiser of Central State College,
        Wilberforce, Ohio.

        [Appendix Vau of The Illuminatus! Trilogy]
        http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0440539811/ref=nosim/thedanclorenecro
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.