Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

The Psychic Challenge - James Randi - Kirti Betai

Expand Messages
  • Kirti Betai
    IMPORTANT COPY FORWARDED WITH COMPLIMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORD & INFORMATION ... From: Kirti Betai To: James Randi
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 22, 1999
    • 0 Attachment
      IMPORTANT
      COPY FORWARDED WITH COMPLIMENTS
      FOR PUBLIC RECORD & INFORMATION

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Kirti Betai <mvs@...>
      To: James Randi <JamesRandi@...>
      Cc: James Randi --- Wizard <JREFInfo@...>
      Date: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 7:38 AM
      Subject: Your Letter Dated January 20, 1999 - The Psychic Challenge


      >From: Kirti Betai <mvs@...>
      >
      >Greetings and Radhasoami.
      >
      >Reproduced hereunder is my communication Dated 21 February 1999 sent to you
      >by email - in reply to your letter dated January 20, 1999 - which was your
      >response to my acceptance dated on/about October 03, 1998 of your original
      >open public offer on the Internet - called The Psychic Challenge OR The
      >Pegasus Award - made by you and your organization that you represent -
      which
      >constitutes an agreement - valid and binding upon you and your
      organization.
      >
      >You might have learnt in some school - that an offer when accepted becomes
      a
      >promise. OR DID YOU?
      >
      >Obviously you have not responded to my communication dated 21 February 1999
      >as yet - nor have you requested for some time to respond to my said
      >communication.
      >
      >Since you have already taken almost 4 months to respond to my acceptance
      >dated on/about October 1998 by responding through your letter only on/about
      >January 20, 1999 - and since your said letter encloses a nice little sample
      >of deep research work that you and your boys have done on dowsing BEFORE
      >responding to my said acceptance - you should not need any time to think or
      >consider - how to reply to my last communication to you. - Or do you?
      >
      >If you do, feel free to request.
      >
      >Your choices are very clear. OR are they?
      >
      >This is the second and the last time I remind you to :
      >
      >1) ACCEPT MY TEST PROCEDURE IMMEDIATELY -
      >
      >OR -
      >
      >2) PUBLICLY ADMIT THAT YOU WERE AND ARE A BIG AMAZING FRAUD.
      >
      >Obviously - you shall have to face the consequences of either of your
      >decisions.
      >
      >Obviously - your silence for the next 24 hours shall be construed as your
      >having chosen the option no. 2 (above) - that YOU PUBLICLY ADMIT THAT YOU
      >WERE AND ARE A BIG AMAZING FRAUD.
      >
      >Obviously - this important information will have to be made public.
      >
      >Obviously - you are open to all other legal consequences of your original
      >offer - and your subsequent breach.
      >
      >Obviously - YOU ALONE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE COSTS AND ALL THE DIRECT
      >AND INDIRECT CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACTIONS AND INACTION OF THE PAST THE
      >PRESENT AND THE FUTURE.
      >
      >Obviously - silence is consent.
      >
      >Obviously - you ARE AMAZED.
      >
      >Kirti Betai
      >www.cosmopathy.org.in (opening shortly)
      >Pyramid Energy Systems - Pendulum Querying Systems -
      >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      >Dated 21 February 1999
      >
      >From: Kirti Betai <mvs@...>
      >
      >Greetings and Radhasoami.
      >
      >This acknowledges your letter dated January 20, 1999 in reply to my letter
      >dated October 03, 1998 alongwith Application for status of claimant which
      is
      >merely an acceptance of rules covering your offer and itself constitutes an
      >agreement.
      >
      >For your ready reference I quote from the Agreement the following
      >provisions:-
      >
      >1) "Test procedures must be agreed upon by both parties .... We do not
      >act as judges ......"
      >
      >2) "I James Randi ........... ability of any kind UNDER SATISFACTORY
      >OBSERVING CONDITIONS ......."
      >
      >You have stated in your letter dated January 20, 1999 that my suggested
      test
      >is invalid.
      >
      >You have NO AUTHORITY under OUR AGREEMENT to pass any such judgement.
      >
      >You have stated in your letter dated January 20, 1999 that ingesting snake
      >poison is quite harmless, so that is not a valid test.
      >
      >Your logic is conspicuous by absence. Nowhere in our agreement there is any
      >provision that indicates that the test procedure has to be harmful to be
      >valid.
      >
      >You are free to back out from your offer if you are scared or if you want
      to
      >keep your million with yourself to perpetuate your gimmick.
      >
      >But you are not free to avoid the consequences thereof.
      >
      >I have received dozens of messages stating that you are a fraud. Your
      letter
      >dated January 20, 1999 does provide some evidence to that effect. But I
      will
      >reserve my judgement until your next communication.
      >
      >Kirti Betai
      >Pyramid Energy Systems - Pendulum Querying Systems -
      >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      >
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.