Dr Ann wrote:
> Dear Eric: I hve been reading your internet stuff - VERY interesting.
> I must tell you that BECAUSE I can do alot of these things, that I am a
> huge sceptic. I really do not trust anyone - not even me!. I do not
> know HOW i do these things - healing, channeling, dogtalk, dowsing, etc.
> I only know that I get positive feedback from those people and animals I
> touch. No one is more surprised than I when something works.
> Perhaps you could talk to that point? I did read somewhere, just
> recently, that they "proved" that when there are negative people in the
> room, then nothing works. I don't know about that, but I DO know that I
> have to feel good in my surroundings before I will even try. That is
> why I have been experimenting with the web. I am working with an animal
> behaviourist over the net - she is in England. We have had 2 success!!!
> I haven't a clue how this worked, but she reported amazing changes in
> the dogs. Best wishes. Dr. Ann
Thanks for your response. In many paranormal forums, I hear people who
believe because of experiential evidence. If I saw a ghost or UFO - that
would make me a believer, but it wouldn't be "transferable" evidence. It
wouldn't be repeatable or possible to examine - hence, I couldn't expect to
convince others. I use a rule that more fantastic claims require more
complete evidence for me to believe. Many people believe based on anecdotes -
but I recommend expecting more solid evidence. At least consider that most
illnesses spontaneously remiss and the afflicted can all too easily think they
are cured because they WANT to be cured. There are hundreds of claimed
systems of healing - I think you'd agree they can't all be right. But they are
still trusted because of experience. A double blind study with careful
protocol and a control group is a better way to test claims of healing.
On first glimpse, the claim "this effect is nullified by the presence of
skeptics" smells like "we can't fool the skeptics". But even if skeptics exude
a "paranormal dampening field", it should still be possible for honest
believers with a proper procedure to assess truth. If you have something
real, you should try to perform better tests to hope to help enlighten the
rest of the world. Or let me know the claim and I may be able to help you
devise an objective test to measure it.
Eric Krieg eric@...
fax (215) 654-0651
People can sign up for the more active skeptic list by Fred at:
The skeptic discussion board is at: