Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

scary report on censoring of Science at the Grand Canyon

Expand Messages
  • erickrieg@verizon.net
    From Michael Shermer s eSkeptic magazine In this week s eSkeptic, geologist and paleontologist Dr. Donald
    Message 1 of 2 , Jan 17, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      From Michael Shermer's "eSkeptic" magazine In this week's eSkeptic, geologist and paleontologist Dr. Donald
      >Prothero discusses the latest creationist challenge to science in the
      >form of banning park rangers at the Grand Canyon from telling people
      >how old it is!
      >Dr. Donald R. Prothero is Professor of Geology at Occidental College
      >in Los Angeles, and Lecturer in Geobiology at the California Institute
      >of Technology in Pasadena. He is currently the author, co-author,
      >editor, or co-editor of 21 books and almost 200 scientific papers,
      >including five leading geology textbooks and three trade books. He is
      >on the editorial board of Skeptic magazine, and in the past has served
      >as an associate or technical editor for Geology, Paleobiology and
      >Journal of Paleontology. He is a Fellow of the Geological Society of
      >America, the Paleontological Society, and the Linnaean Society of
      >London, and has also received fellowships from the Guggenheim
      >Foundation and the National Science Foundation. He has also been
      >featured on several television documentaries, including episodes of
      >Paleoworld and Walking with Prehistoric Beasts.
      >Creationism in Our National Parks
      >by Donald Prothero
      >If you thought that censoring talk about global warming and
      >suppressing the free speech of government scientists was bad enough,
      >last December the government reached a new low. According to documents
      >released on Dec. 28, 2006 by the Public Employees for Environmental
      >Responsibility (PEER), Bush administration appointees will not allow
      >rangers at Grand Canyon National Park to mention that the earth is
      >more than a few thousand years old. "In order to avoid offending
      >religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders
      >to suspend its belief in geology," said PEER Director Jeff Ruch. "It
      >is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to
      >the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is `no comment.'" I have been
      >unable to confirm this report in my own enquiries among rangers and on
      >the NPS website, but perhaps the order is still being considered at
      >the NPS and has not yet been forced on the rangers.
      >This is just the latest step in a creeping introduction of religious
      >fundamentalism to our National Parks. Under the "faith-based"
      >initiatives of the Bush Administration, the National Park Service
      >(NPS) is now creating "faith-based" parks by placing crosses in
      >numerous places, and Biblical verses on the plaques overlooking the
      >Grand Canyon. These plaques were reinstated by Bush appointees after
      >the NPS director had them removed on advice of lawyers in the
      >Department of the Interior. In August 2003, the creationist book Grand
      >Canyon: A Different View, by Tom Vail, was introduced to the Grand
      >Canyon bookstore. It promotes the absurd idea of young-earth
      >creationists that every layer in the Grand Canyon (PLUS its subsequent
      >carving) can be explained by Noah's flood. There were national
      >protests from geologists, all the relevant scientific organizations,
      >and NPS personnel (including the entire NPS geologic staff), and Park
      >Service Superintendent Joe Alston blocked its sale. But Bush
      >appointees at the NPS headquarters intervened and overruled Alston.
      >NPS Chief of Communications David Barna then told Congress and
      >reporters that there would be a review of the issue, but no such
      >review was even requested, even after 3 years — and the creationist
      >book is still on sale in the Grand Canyon! And it is clear that the
      >Bush appointees in the NPS are pandering to the religious right.
      >According to an NPS spokesperson Elaine Sevy, speaking to a Baptist
      >news agency, "Now that the book has become quite popular, we don't
      >want to remove it."
      >The political bias of the process is even more starkly revealed by the
      >way in which the NPS policy approves books for sale in its parks. The
      >policy clearly states that the books are supposed to reflect only the
      >highest quality of science and support approved interpretive themes.
      >According to records, Grand Canyon officials rejected 22 other books
      >for placement on the shelves in 2003, and approved only one — the
      >creationist book. In 2005, the NPS approved Director's Order #6,
      >section 8.4.2, which states that "history of the Earth must be based
      >on the best scientific evidence available, as found in scholarly
      >sources that have stood the test of scientific peer review and
      >criticism [and] Interpretive and educational programs must refrain
      >from appearing to endorse religious beliefs explaining natural processes."
      >This raises even larger, more troubling issues. It's already bad
      >enough that only a minority of Americans have even a limited
      >understanding of evolution, and a majority still believe the creation
      >story is literally true. It's worse that creationists have effectively
      >destroyed the teaching of evolution in science classes around the
      >country by pressure on school boards and textbook publishers, even
      >though the courts have ruled against them every time. Now their attack
      >is focused on geology and the age of the earth, making one of our most
      >essential sciences highly vulnerable. If creationists managed to put
      >their bizarre notions of geology into place, do you think that we
      >would have another new oil discovery, or find any more precious
      >minerals or groundwater? Not likely! Their first attack is naturally
      >in a place like Grand Canyon, which is so popular and so clearly shows
      >the immense span of earth's history, but who's to say where they'll
      >strike next? Many of the national parks, such as Petrified Forest and
      >Dinosaur and Badlands and John Day Fossil Beds, also display an
      >impressive record of fossils changing through time in way that cannot
      >be explained by the Bible. According to PEER Director Ruch, "As one
      >park geologist said, this is equivalent of Yellowstone National Park
      >selling a book entitled Geysers of Old Faithful: Nostrils of Satan."
      >For further details…
      >* www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=801
      > * www.time.com/time/columnist/jaroff/article/0,9565,783829,00.html
      > * www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=428
      >Take action on the issue
      >For those of you who wish to take action on this issue, we recommend
      >Ms. Mary Bomar, Director
      >National Park Service
      >1849 C Street NW
      >Washington, DC 20240
      >US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
      >354 Dirksen Senate Building
      >Washington, DC 20510
      >202-224-4971 (phone)
      >202-224-6163 (fax)
      >US Senate Subcommittee on National Parks
      >(a subcommittee of the above)
      >354 Dirksen Senate Building
      >Washington, DC 20510
      >202-224-4103 (phone)
      >202-224-4340 (fax)
      >Express your concern to a committee member and request that hearings
      >be held to discuss this unconstitutional practice. Contact your local
      >representative using the following list of Democratic members of the
      >US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
      >* Jeff Bingaman (NM)
      > * Ranking Member *
      > 202-224-5521
      > website
      > * Daniel K. Akaka (HI)
      > 202-224-6361
      > website
      > * Byron Dorgan (ND)
      > 202-224-2551
      > website
      > * Bob Graham (FL)
      > 202-224-3041
      > * Ron Wyden (OR)
      > 202-224-5244
      > website
      > * Tim Johnson (SD)
      > 202-224-5842
      > website
      >* Mary L. Landrieu (LA)
      > 202-224-5824
      > website
      > * Evan Bayh (IN)
      > 202-224-5623
      > website
      > * Dianne Feinstein (CA)
      > 202-224-3841
      > website
      > * Charles Schumer (NY)
      > 202-224-6542
      > website
      > * Maria Cantwell (WA)
      > 202-224-3441
      > website
      > * SEE LIST of Republican members
    • Catherine Fiorello
      This report has been withdrawn. http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-01-17.html Cathy ***** Catherine A. Fiorello, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Program
      Message 2 of 2 , Jan 18, 2007
      • 0 Attachment
        This report has been withdrawn.


        Catherine A. Fiorello, Ph.D.
        Associate Professor and Program Coordinator
        School Psychology Program
        Temple University
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.