Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Skeptic, general discussion of skepticism with believer

Expand Messages
  • Eric Krieg
    David, you said it was OK to copy others, so I m copying Jim and my skeptic email list. It s true, I probably have more patience and openness that most
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 16, 1998

      you said it was OK to copy others, so I'm copying Jim and
      my skeptic email list. It's true, I probably have more patience
      and openness that most skeptics. I feel an honest skeptic would
      change their mind if confronted with sufficient evidence. I'm
      well aware of criticism of skeptics (I'm in touch with many
      of the critics). There is a good overview of them at:

      Yes, I would love to switch sides and promote a wonderful
      way to find water, or read minds, or heal people. But I serve
      truth above all else. I feel I must not believe something because
      it would be nicer to believe. I'd love to believe there is
      nothing wrong with my body but still get check ups.

      Many skeptics have written on humans being selectively blinded.
      Survival would seem to favor irrational conclusions. If you see
      another creature do something and be harmed, it's safest to just
      believe the doing something precipitated action. A real rational
      analytical mind would not be very useful to hunter gathers.

      In my work, I assumed that a software routine I wrote worked
      properly. There was evidence of a crash being caused by my
      code. I had a theory how it could be someone else's fault - but
      I was eventually forced after doing tests to admit the fault was
      my own. My debugging problems at work are a regular living out
      of seeing data, formulated hypothesis, collecting more information
      and having to be willing to form conclusions independent of my
      initial conclusions. In the greater course of life,
      I've had to conclude that former friends
      were scoundrels, that people I voted for suck, that purchases
      and stocks I invest in were bad. If I was unable to change
      my mind, I'd be a loser. I feel I must continuously adjust my level
      of expectations for quality of proof.
      I can't speak for skeptic Jim, but I suspect if someone were
      able to offer, "Jim, this data here is the best supporting data
      we have for paranormal theory X", rather than wade through
      stacks of stuff, he would be open to a closer look.

      best wishes, Eric

      > ---------- Eric's origin message:
      > > David,
      > >
      > > TT is Therapeutic Touch. More info at:
      > > http://www.voicenet.com/~eric/tt
      > >
      > > I don't think anyone seeks to change their view. Hopefully
      > > people seek to challenge their veiw with something that
      > > may change it. Leading skeptic, Joe Nickell told me,
      > > "I'd rather believe in the paranormal - it would be far
      > > more fun and add more hope to life". That's how I feel -
      > > I'd love to switch sides. Either way, I want to help
      > > spread truth, and even more: help people to learn how
      > > to assess their own truth.
      > >
      > =============== the following is David's answer to my above statement:
      > Hi Eric... I really don't know what to make of you above statement...
      > particularly since from what I can tell from your emails, you really are
      > more open than the others I have talked to about this issue.
      > But I do not buy into what you say for the simple reason that "if you would
      > love to switch sides" you arlready would have.
      > You ARE where you are, because you love that postion most.... if you loved
      > the other side most, then you'd be there.... on that side.
      > That is a fact.
      > So YOU are choosing your position... no one else is choosing it for you....
      > It is just the other way around. Because of your mind set you will only
      > see and accept the facts that agree with your current position... basically
      > you will screen out and dismiss everything and anything that - as you say
      > above - "challenges" that position.
      > This analysis may not be accurate about, you, Eric... like I say.... you
      > SOUND more open than that.
      > But I would almost guarantee that this analysis is very applicable to Jim.
      > I am astounded by how much time he spends finding all the reasons not to
      > go look at an actual living paranormal .... and to see for himself. The
      > only explanation that I can imagine for this is that he really does not
      > want to find the evidence... AND UNTIL THAT ATTITUDE OF HIS CHANGES......
      > you could stack opportunities to SEE DIFFERENTLY in front of him and he
      > would reject and find a way around every one of those opportunities.
      > So, Eric... that is the caution to apply to yourself as well (and me to
      > apply to myself as well).
      > The fact of the matter is that it appears to me that ALL HUMANS are
      > selectively focused and selectively blind. The only question s are: to
      > what degree are we blinded and about what are we blinded and why are we
      > blinded to these particular things?
      > Ie: what kind of limited illusion are we identifying with and "believing"
      > that this illusion is the real truth.
      > That trap does not trap only skeptics..... oh no...... I am seeing all
      > sorts of newagers in the same kind of trap. The beliefs that they
      > espouse and cling to are quite different than that demonstrated by the
      > skeptic....... but the problem is the same.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.