Fw: Why Indian Parliamentarians are not honest to accept their important responsibility ?
- TRUTH SHALL ALWAYS PREVAIL
Milap Choraria Editor: Suchna Ka Adhikar / RTI TIMES
National Convenor : Movement for Accountability to Public (MAP)
--- On Sun, 10/26/08, Milap Choraria <milap_choraria@...> wrote:
From: Milap Choraria <milap_choraria@...>
Subject: Why Indian Parliamentarians are not honest to accept their important responsibility ?
Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 9:12 PM
Why Indian Parliamentarians are not honest to accept their important responsibility ?
A full page advertisement was published on 6th October, 2007, in the New York Times, interalia with the very serious allegation that Shri Rajiv Gandhi, the husband of most powerful lady of Indian Politics, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, is alleged to have received payments from KGB. According to Schweizer, Illustrierte, Rajiv has a secret Swiss Bank account of 2 billion dollars. Her son Shri Rahul Gandhi, who is projected (by Congress Party) as next Prime Minister of India , was detained by FBI with large unaccounted cash at Boston Airport in 2001. (Swiss magazine Schweizer, Illustrierte 11/1991, Indo Asian News Service.
The matter is very serious and concerns a situation of compromise with the prestige of the Country in public esteem, the World Over. Once, the then Congress President Late Mr. Barua, said Indira is India . Whereas, India has never been Indira, hence, we have seen the result. Now, people are busy to establish that Sonia Gandhi is Congress Party, as appears from the action taken by Indian National Overseas Congress (INOC), a surrogate arm of the Indian National Congress in USA, by filing a $100 million libel lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court against two Indian Americans, Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani for allegedly defaming the Congress Party president Sonia Gandhi through the aforesaid advertisement against her in The New York Times. Mr. Surinder Malhotra, who as president of INOC had moved the court, had to withdraw the same and now he claims that withdrawal of the Suit is not the defeat, and is now consulting the Indian National Congress Party, for re-filling of the Suit, as if Sonia Gandhi is Indian National Congress Party, while he himself admitted that Court felt INOC or he himself were not the aggrieved party. Now the BIG QUESTION is that if through the aforesaid advertisement Smt Sonia Gandhi and Shri Rahul Gandhi feel that they are defamed, then why they themselves in their individual capacity are not filing the said defamation case in the USA Court ?
The following extracts from the aforesaid advertisement published in the “NewYork Times” dated 6th October, 2007, reflects that the advertisement casts a very serious and personal allegation of corruption, against the family of Smt. Sonia Gandhi, thereby lowering her esteem in public image:-
“Her husband Rajiv Gandhi is alleged to have received payments from KGB. According to Schweizer, Illustrierte, Rajiv has a secret Swiss Bank account of 2 billion dollars. Her son Rahul projected as next Prime Minister of India, was detained by FBI with large unaccounted cash at Boston Airport in 2001. (Swiss magazine Schweizer, Illustrierte 11/1991, Indo Asian News Service).” “Her party was involved in the UN Oil for Food Scam that helped Saddam Hussain. (From this language it is amply clear that charges were made against her in her personal capacity for misusing her position as President of Congress Party. The allegation nowhere puts the blame on the Indian National Congress Party). She was involved in numerous scams, scandals and controversies. Before entering India , she was an au-pair with modest means. Since then, she and her family members have amassed millions through questionable means. (Know Your Sonia by India First Foundation).”
Advertisement is posted at : http://rtitimes.net/truth
Charges mentioned in the advertisement are of a very serious nature since it paints Shri Rajiv Gandhi as one of the most corrupt politicians of the Country, contrary to his image in India as Mr. Clean. Therefore, truth must come out before the Indian Citizenry. In this respect it is an incumbent responsibility upon each Indian Parliamentarian, including from the Congress Party, to stand for the truth, by ensuring a free, fair and transparent enquiry in the matter. If charges leveled through the aforesaid advertisement would be proved as malicious and false, this will enhance the goodwill of Smt. Sonia Gandhi manifolds, as against the claim of the alleged defamation. Otherwise, scars of doubts and blemishes would cast a permanent mark on the integrity and honesty by leaving an impression that she is misusing her position to control the Office of the Prime Minister and the Central Government, to put the matter under an un-pregnable covert. Whereas, under the changed Swiss Banking Law, which mandated the Swiss Banks to know their clients, the Government of India, can trace out the actual position about alleged Secret Bank Account, if earlier held by Shri Rajiv Gandhi, since Banks must know also his beneficiaries, which might be Smt. Sonia Gandhi, and / or Shri Rahul Gandhi and / or Ms. Priyanka Gandhi, if any such account really ever existed. Similarly in the present scenario, USSR , Power of Communist Party and KGB are nowhere. Under the changed system of the Governance in Russia , if the Central Government makes free, fair and transparent and a serious and honest effort, it can get all the true facts about the factual payments, if any were ever made by the KGB to Shri Rajiv Gandhi. This is just not necessary for the political health and strong democracy of India , but also for the sake of the prestige and honor of the heavenly soul of our late Prime Minister, Shri Rajiv Gandhi too.
As regards to the matter, concerning whether Shri Rahul Gandhi, was detained by FBI with large unaccounted cash at Boston Airport in 2001 or not, this can be easily enquired by the Central Government.