Re: [sig] David Nicolle
- In a message dated 4/20/2001 12:05:10 AM Central Daylight Time,
> Unfortunatelly, although David Nicolle does a lot of great work and has putI second that. I own, in fact, Nicolle's book _Peipus 1242_ (BTW, it is, or
> a lot of stuff otherwise unavailable in English out there, you have to be
> careful when using his books. Sometimes his source seems to be David
> Nicolle, PhD.
> This is not to say that you should not rely on him -- you should, but
> check the sources when able.
was, difficult to find at Barnes and Noble on-line because of a cataloguing
mistake). I have used that book, I like the photographs and the maps, but his
historical overview is extremely confusing and required double-checking every
fact. His bibliography was more useful than the book itself. I have some
problems with the illustrations in the book, and with his statements about
the composition of the Russian army.
Per fess embattled azure and gules, two otters passant or.
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/Predslava/RussianHistoryTriviaPage.html">Russian History Trivia Page</A>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]