Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [sig] Book of Veles and the Zorya

Expand Messages
  • Sarayya@aol.com
    What is the Zorya ? What does the word mean? How do you pronounce it? I find it interesting because it is somewhat close to my name. Soraya Evodia of Odessa
    Message 1 of 12 , Aug 2, 2000
    • 0 Attachment
      What is the "Zorya"? What does the word mean?

      How do you pronounce it?

      I find it interesting because it is somewhat close to my name.

      Soraya Evodia of Odessa
    • serguei plonski
      Hello, Zorya means sunrise in Russian. It is pronounced zaria with a stress on a first syllable. In Russian mythology (according to the Book of Veles)
      Message 2 of 12 , Aug 2, 2000
      • 0 Attachment
        Hello,

        Zorya means "sunrise" in Russian. It is pronounced "zaria" with a stress on
        a first syllable. In Russian mythology (according to the Book of Veles)
        there are three potent female deities - Zorya Utrennia, Zorya Dnevnaia and
        Zorya Vechernia. Their names mean - "Morning sunrise", "Noon sunrise" and
        "evening sunrise".

        They allegedly mated with sons of Orei and produced the Slavic nation as we
        know it.

        BB

        Sergei


        >From: Sarayya@...
        >Reply-To: sig@egroups.com
        >To: sig@egroups.com
        >Subject: Re: [sig] Book of Veles and the Zorya
        >Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 03:12:54 EDT
        >
        >What is the "Zorya"? What does the word mean?
        >
        >How do you pronounce it?
        >
        >I find it interesting because it is somewhat close to my name.
        >
        >Soraya Evodia of Odessa
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >

        ________________________________________________________________________
        Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
      • Dmitriy V. Ryaboy
        ... Which means you need to triple check it... -D ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from
        Message 3 of 12 , Aug 2, 2000
        • 0 Attachment
          >From: "serguei plonski" <p_serguei@...>

          >Hello,
          >In Russian mythology (according to the Book of Veles)


          Which means you need to triple check it...

          -D
          ________________________________________________________________________
          Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
        • LiudmilaV@aol.com
          In a message dated 8/2/2000 9:48:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time, p_serguei@hotmail.com writes:
          Message 4 of 12 , Aug 2, 2000
          • 0 Attachment
            In a message dated 8/2/2000 9:48:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
            p_serguei@... writes:

            << Zorya means "sunrise" in Russian. It is pronounced "zaria" with a stress
            on
            a first syllable. In Russian mythology (according to the Book of Veles)
            there are three potent female deities - Zorya Utrennia, Zorya Dnevnaia and
            Zorya Vechernia. Their names mean - "Morning sunrise", "Noon sunrise" and
            "evening sunrise".
            >>

            "Zorya" is not a sunrise but a look of the sky and the time of day when the
            sun goes up or down. The stress, at least in modern Russian, is at the last
            syllable. Sorry. (Soraya -- I will pronounce it for you if you remind me,
            it is indeed close to your name).

            Liudmila
          • serguei plonski
            Hello, Liudmila! You are absolutely right. I apologize for the misleading information. It s just the usual ignorance of a native speaker who spent too much
            Message 5 of 12 , Aug 2, 2000
            • 0 Attachment
              Hello, Liudmila!

              You are absolutely right. I apologize for the misleading information. It's
              just the usual ignorance of a native speaker who spent too much time away
              from home.

              I'm trying to remember if the people in my community ever used "zaria" to
              indicate the look on the sky at sunsets... Maybe they did and I just don't
              remember.

              Thanks for corrections!

              Sergei


              >From: LiudmilaV@...
              >Reply-To: sig@egroups.com
              >To: sig@egroups.com
              >Subject: Re: [sig] Book of Veles and the Zorya
              >Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:40:19 EDT
              >
              >In a message dated 8/2/2000 9:48:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
              >p_serguei@... writes:
              >
              ><< Zorya means "sunrise" in Russian. It is pronounced "zaria" with a stress
              >on
              > a first syllable. In Russian mythology (according to the Book of Veles)
              > there are three potent female deities - Zorya Utrennia, Zorya Dnevnaia
              >and
              > Zorya Vechernia. Their names mean - "Morning sunrise", "Noon sunrise" and
              > "evening sunrise".
              > >>
              >
              >"Zorya" is not a sunrise but a look of the sky and the time of day when the
              >sun goes up or down. The stress, at least in modern Russian, is at the
              >last
              >syllable. Sorry. (Soraya -- I will pronounce it for you if you remind me,
              >it is indeed close to your name).
              >
              >Liudmila
              >
              >
              >
              >
              >

              ________________________________________________________________________
              Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
            • MHoll@aol.com
              In a message dated 8/2/2000 11:48:11 AM Central Daylight Time, ... we ... And once again, I need to caution all those who are doing historical research --
              Message 6 of 12 , Aug 3, 2000
              • 0 Attachment
                In a message dated 8/2/2000 11:48:11 AM Central Daylight Time,
                p_serguei@... writes:

                > In Russian mythology (according to the Book of Veles)
                > there are three potent female deities - Zorya Utrennia, Zorya Dnevnaia and
                > Zorya Vechernia. Their names mean - "Morning sunrise", "Noon sunrise" and
                > "evening sunrise".
                >
                > They allegedly mated with sons of Orei and produced the Slavic nation as
                we
                > know it.

                And once again, I need to caution all those who are doing historical research
                -- these books are not sources of historical information. They are made up,
                and I am annoyed that they continue to be passed as historical fact. There is
                no historical data about Russian paganism, or Slavic, beyond vague
                information about a variety of minor magical creatures. The consensus at this
                time is that Slavic paganism was a shamanistic/agrarian system with no
                structured Pantheon similar to Greek, Roman, Egyptian, or any other system.

                The indirect information about Slavic beliefs and rituals hints at some
                rituals that involved dancing and music, and more specific information coming
                from questions one parish priest asked of his superior, such as "should the
                bride be allowed to slice the cheese" -- a direct reference to something we
                encounter in much later sources about wedding rituals. However, "slicing the
                cheese" and other tidbits don't paint a picture of Russian paganism, just a
                few spots of color on a blank canvas.

                Predslava.
              • serguei plonski
                Hello, Predslava!
                Message 7 of 12 , Aug 3, 2000
                • 0 Attachment
                  Hello, Predslava!


                  <..And once again, I need to caution all those who are doing historical
                  research
                  >-- these books are not sources of historical information. They are made up,
                  >and I am annoyed that they continue to be passed as historical fact..>

                  I just want to make a couple of points here:

                  first of all, neither the book itself nor any of its interpreters suggest
                  that the Book of Veles is a history textbook. It cannot be even labelled
                  "chronicles". It is a collection of sacred writings of one of the religious
                  sects of ancient Slavs. Would you consider studying history from the Bible
                  or Bhagavat Gita?

                  And secondly, it is very easy to dismiss the book just by calling it a fake.
                  But shouldn't it be proven to be a fake then? Why don't we get one of those
                  historians to point us out the errors and abnormaliies that would render it
                  a fake?

                  But this hasn't been done. Some of the critics don't even bother to read the
                  source itself, being convinced that it's a fake from the start. I'm not
                  saying it's authentic, but until the serious research is done on that book
                  it should remain inconclusive.

                  BB

                  Sergei
                  ________________________________________________________________________
                  Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
                • Vaclav von Pressburg
                  On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:43:07AM -0400, serguei plonski wrote: . . . ... The claim is that the Book of Veles is a literary fake, not a religious book. ...
                  Message 8 of 12 , Aug 4, 2000
                  • 0 Attachment
                    On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:43:07AM -0400, serguei plonski wrote:
                    . . .
                    > first of all, neither the book itself nor any of its interpreters suggest
                    > that the Book of Veles is a history textbook. It cannot be even labelled
                    > "chronicles". It is a collection of sacred writings of one of the religious
                    > sects of ancient Slavs. Would you consider studying history from the Bible
                    > or Bhagavat Gita?

                    The claim is that the Book of Veles is a literary fake, not a
                    religious book.

                    > And secondly, it is very easy to dismiss the book just by calling it a fake.
                    > But shouldn't it be proven to be a fake then? Why don't we get one of those
                    > historians to point us out the errors and abnormalities that would render it
                    > a fake?

                    The Book of Veles is one of a class of romantic fakes, like the
                    Osian cycle of Scotland. I seem to recall a similar work from 19th
                    century Czech literature. The case against this class of work rests
                    on the following grounds

                    1) Lack of _any_ indication of such information in the period
                    between the supposed composition of the work and its
                    publication. Thus for the Book of Veles there is a complete
                    absence of evidence for the survival of Slavic paganism into
                    medieval and modern times.
                    2) Lack of an original manuscript. This is a very important
                    consideration. If you found an old, hidden manuscript that
                    had such important information would you lose track of it? Even
                    if it were disintegrating, you would keep the pieces.
                    3) Simply reading the handwriting of an old manuscript is
                    difficult. The average person who is used to reading printed
                    books would need the assistance of a palaeographic specialist to
                    decipher most old manuscripts.
                    4) The language is anachronistic. This doesn't just involve
                    grammatical forms and word usage, but also style which can
                    change significantly in the course of only a century. As an
                    example, pick up a book published in 1910 or 1920 and compare
                    the style to that in a current English book.

                    --
                    Waclaw von Pressburg Veritas liberabit uos
                    vaclav@...
                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.