10275Re: Re: Re: Re: cunnan, an SCA wiki
- Aug 13, 2005I would avoid using this like the plague.
Given the nature of my job (I am a Czech->English translator
specialising in archaeological, heritage and related topics), I
regularly, i.e. every day, have to use the internet to look up
terminology, vocabulary, historical contexts etc.
Whatever the THEORY, my actual EXPERIENCE with Wikipedia has been that
it is not up to standard. It contains much information which is
plagiarised from other sources on the web, and a great deal of material
that is simply incorrect - and which has not been corrected simply
because it falls within subject areas likely to be of interest to very
few readers. Moreover, presumably because there is no academic rigour, a
great deal of what might charitably be termed "Romantic" (with capital
R) material is on there that cannot really be supported...
As a result, I have stopped using Wikipedia altogether: it's just too
unreliable, uneven and unbalanced.
So... I would say that the Knowledge Pages should NOT be in an
open-access, anyone-can-post-whatever format. Not only is the quality of
available material an issue: so too is the danger of the relevant
knowledge page losing its structure, or of certain areas (clothing,
perhaps) coming to dominate entirely at the expense of less "popular"
always ready with jugs of cold water! ;-)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.8/71 - Release Date: 12.8.2005
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>