Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [shinlist] Re: A Most Interesting Placen - Rick

Expand Messages
  • Clifton Ong
    Hi Lotusware, Shin in Shin Buddhism ¿¿½¡ is exactly what Rick explained, in Kanji it is ¿¿ (True), whereas Faith is ¿®, and Spirit is ¿À
    Message 1 of 39 , Oct 18, 2005
      Hi Lotusware,
      "Shin" in "Shin Buddhism ¿¿½¡" is exactly what Rick
      explained, in Kanji it is ¿¿ (True), whereas "Faith"
      is ¿®, and "Spirit" is ¿À (also meaning deity), so
      they are different characters with different meanings.
      Shin Buddhism was an abbreviation coined (i think) by
      Suzuki Daisetzu. "Shinshu" is an abbreviation of "Jodo
      Shinshu ¾ôÅÚ¿¿½¡".
      Hope this helped.

      --- lotusaware <lotusaware@...> wrote:

      > Hi,
      > I have been thinking about this some more. Your
      > answer was half the explanation needed.
      > Now what does the "Shin" in "Shin Buddhism" mean?
      > The closest I can come to is "Faith Buddhism" and
      > that doen't seem quite right. I also
      > identify "Shin" with "Spirit" or "spirits" (from the
      > Chinese rather than the Japanese).
      > What is your take on this?
      > lotusaware
      > --- In shinlist@yahoogroups.com, "lotusaware"
      > <lotusaware@y...> wrote:
      > >
      > > Reply below.
      > >
      > > --- In shinlist@yahoogroups.com, Shin02143@a...
      > wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Lotus,
      > > >
      > > > You've taken "shin" out of context. It is part
      > of the larger expression,
      > > > Jodo SHINshu, which means True (shin) teaching
      > (shu) of the Pure Land (Jodo).
      > > > It is not saying that it is the only true
      > Buddhism, just the true Pure Land
      > > > teaching. Recall that there were many Pureland
      > heterodoxies in Shinran's
      > > > time, thus his intention to clarify what is the
      > true teaching of the
      > > > Pure Land way.
      > > > gassho,
      > > > Rick
      > > >
      > > > In a message dated 10/10/05 12:25:11 AM,
      > lotusaware@y... writes:
      > >
      > > > > BTW doesn't "Shin" translate as "True" so
      > "Shin Buddhism" is the True
      > > > > Buddhism?
      > > > > Hmmmm.
      > > > > lotusaware
      > >
      > > Rick,
      > > Thank you for your concise explanation. The same
      > question was raised in Temple just
      > this
      > > Sunday and the same conclusion finally was reached
      > after much struggle. Your
      > explanation
      > > is clearer and I will present it to the group.
      > >
      > > la
      > >

      Gassho, Clifton Dodatsu Ong (Rev)

      Email: sanath_sg@...

      Homepage: http://shinmission_sg.tripod.com/index.html

      "Other Power is none other than the Tathagatha's Primal Vow" - Kyogyoshinsho

      Do You Yahoo!?
      Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    • Shin02143@aol.com
      That s great advice, Galen, bows to you and Prof. Matsunaga. gassho, Rick ... From: Galen Gorelangton To: shinlist@yahoogroups.com Sent:
      Message 39 of 39 , Oct 27, 2005
        That's great advice, Galen, bows to you and Prof. Matsunaga.


        -----Original Message-----
        From: Galen Gorelangton <monto48@...>
        To: shinlist@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
        Subject: [shinlist] Re: Losing my Religion?



        Hello everyone,

             My name is Galen, and this is the first poste I am sending on
        this group, which I have recently joined. I have been reading through
        the chain entitled "Losing my Religion?" and cannot help but think of a
        few things. First, a few simple words by the Temple Master of my dojo,
        Professor Matsunaga; once, during a dharma-talk, he stated very matter
        of factly, somthing to the effect of;

         "If you want to believe that Amida is an actual person that lives in
        a place called the Pureland, that is ok; if you want to believe that
        Amida is your idealized self, and the Pureland is this absolute moment,
        that is ok too."

             It is just that simple, at least in his mind. The truth of the
        matter, I think, is that we truely are foolish being that realy have
        no clue as to the matter of these things, or even any method for
        judging truth objectively. We are rather helpless things, we humans.
        Which of us can truely claim to know whether or not there is a land so
        many kalpas to west, or for that matter, what the true intent of the
        writers of the sutras was?

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.