Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Technological innovation may have driven first human migration

Expand Messages
  • SP News
    30 October 2008 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2008.1196 Technological innovation may have driven first human migration Ancient tools give up their makers
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 31, 2008
      30 October 2008 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2008.1196

      Technological innovation may have driven first human migration

      Ancient tools give up their makers' secrets.

      Cheryl Jones

      These Still Bay stone tools, made about 71,000 years ago, were probably used as spearheads.Chris Henshilwood

      Technological innovation is more likely to have spurred the first modern humans to migrate out of Africa than climate change, according to a study that has accurately dated sophisticated stone tools made by our ancestors.

      Scientists have long argued about the forces that drove the transition to modern human behaviour after our species evolved in Africa up to 280,000 years ago.

      Most scholars agree that Homo sapiens passed a threshold between 60,000 and 80,000 years ago, with evidence for more complex technology, ornaments and symbolic art turning up in the archaeological record. Human genetics research also suggests that the population expanded markedly during this time.

      Some say that language was behind the transition. Others put it down to environmental factors that forced humans to migrate across the globe between 60,000 and 70,000 years ago. Both have been linked to technological developments around the time, such as tool-making.

      Zenobia Jacobs, of the University of Wollongong, Australia, and her colleagues have now reanalysed tools from southern Africa that were long seen as markers for the transition, but had not been conclusively dated.
      Tool time

      Jacobs's team looked at tools from nine sites in South Africa, Namibia and Lesotho, using a method called optically stimulated luminescence. This relies on the tendency for natural background radiation to knock electrons out of place in minerals, with more and more of these displaced electrons accumulating over time. The technique then prompts these electrons to snap back into place, releasing a measurable amount of light as they do so, which can be used to date the rock.

      The tools studied are grouped into two types, named after the original sites where they were discovered: Still Bay and Howieson's Poort.

      Sibudu Cave in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, where both Still Bay and Howieson’s Poort stone tools have been found.Lyn Wadley, University of Witwatersrand

      The Still Bay tools, fashioned from a hard, fine-grained rock called silcrete, were in vogue between 71,000 and 71,900 years ago, according to Jacob's analysis. "People went to a lot of effort to make them look pretty," Jacobs said of the precision tools, used as spearheads. "And when they made a mistake, they discarded the tool and started again."

      The Howieson's Poort implements, also made of silcrete, were composite tools, with components hafted to wood to form weapons. They flourished between 59,500 and 64,800 years ago, the team found.

      Comparing these dates with palaeoenvironmental records failed to turn up a close correlation between the industries and dramatic climatic changes, Jacobs says. "We see no consistent pattern between the timing of these industries and major climatic changes, although local conditions probably influenced where people preferred to live," she says.

      The team concludes that these innovations, and the migration of humans associated with them, cannot necessarily be explained by changes in the environment. The results are published in the latest issue of Science1.
      Gradual modernity

      Each of the tool industries flourished for only a brief time, the scientists point out. Between and after the Still Bay and Howieson's Poort phases, the people who made the tools apparently slipped back into the more primitive quartz and quartzite technology of their ancestors. However, it's also possible that they simply left the region, taking their intellectual property with them.

      Palaeoanthropologist Chris Stringer, of Britain's Natural History Museum, says the results suggest that it is impossible to pin down a single date or cause for the expansion out of Africa. "At this stage in the story, modern features are appearing but they're not coming together in the way that we find them later on," he says. "We're getting different bits of modernity showing, and they wax and wane."

      "What the southern African data are showing is that modernity is building up bit by bit — and that process probably went on for a long time in different parts of Africa."

          *
            References
               1. Jacobs, Z. et al. Science 372, 733–735 (2008).


    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.