Re: [service-orientated-architecture] REST/WS*-SOAP Stack Comparison
- On 8/6/08, Steve Jones <jones.steveg@...> wrote:
> I'm in. Can I suggest as its an SOA group that we have an SOA stack+1
> rather than just REST/SOAP so we look at the different layers and then
> we can map REST/SOAP onto a single model.
> I'd also suggest using theI don't think the SOA RM has much to offer a discussion about stacks.
> SOA RM as the basis for that stack.
I'm happy to use OSI in full or in IETF-abbreviated form, or any other
stack based model.
I've seen your discussion regards to OTA.
Do you have or know where I can find an OTA server example built in .Net?
Where can I find the OTA wsdl to import? With provided OTA stuff I can only find the isolated .xsd files. Isn't there an OTA wsdl to get imported?
Thanks in advance
---In firstname.lastname@example.org, <atmanes@...> wrote:Exactly my point, John. Not everyone agrees with your (and my)
distinction between choreography and orchestration. I'm positing that
the person writing the original article was, in fact, talking about
orchestration rather than choreography.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:50 PM, John Evdemon <jevdemon@...> wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2008 at 11:54, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
>> If you define choreography as an executable workflow (a la
>> BPEL), then I think it does
> Minor quibble: BPEL is an orchestration language, not a choreography