Re: [service-orientated-architecture] REST/WS*-SOAP Stack Comparison
- I'm in. Can I suggest as its an SOA group that we have an SOA stack
rather than just REST/SOAP so we look at the different layers and then
we can map REST/SOAP onto a single model. I'd also suggest using the
SOA RM as the basis for that stack.
2008/8/6 Mark Baker <distobj@...>:
> On 8/5/08, Gervas Douglas <gervas.douglas@...> wrote:
>> You do not have to read the REST/WS*-SOAP debates on this Group in
>> great detail to get the persistent impression that there is a
>> significant mismatch of comprehension between the two camps. My idea
>> of a stack comparison was that it would aid in seeing the difference
>> of capabilities/roles/approaches of the two technologies and thus help
>> to reduce misunderstandings. Any volunteers from the ranks of
>> technical genius in this Group??
> I think we've tried this before without success, but if you'd like to
> serve as moderator to keep the discussion on track and technical, I'm
> game to try again.
I've seen your discussion regards to OTA.
Do you have or know where I can find an OTA server example built in .Net?
Where can I find the OTA wsdl to import? With provided OTA stuff I can only find the isolated .xsd files. Isn't there an OTA wsdl to get imported?
Thanks in advance
---In email@example.com, <atmanes@...> wrote:Exactly my point, John. Not everyone agrees with your (and my)
distinction between choreography and orchestration. I'm positing that
the person writing the original article was, in fact, talking about
orchestration rather than choreography.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:50 PM, John Evdemon <jevdemon@...> wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2008 at 11:54, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
>> If you define choreography as an executable workflow (a la
>> BPEL), then I think it does
> Minor quibble: BPEL is an orchestration language, not a choreography