Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

[RN] DEPUTADO AMERICANO ASSUME SER ATEU

Expand Messages
  • Daniel Sottomaior
    SF CHRONICLE, 14-03-2007 STARK S ATHEIST VIEWS BREAK POLITICAL TABOO Rep. Pete Stark of Fremont might have crossed what some are calling one of the last
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 1, 2007
      SF CHRONICLE, 14-03-2007

      STARK'S ATHEIST VIEWS BREAK POLITICAL TABOO

      Rep. Pete Stark of Fremont might have crossed what some are calling
      "one of the last frontiers" in politics when he delighted atheists
      this week by acknowledging that he does not believe in a supreme being.

      Just a generation ago, says Democratic political strategist Dan
      Newman, "you couldn't go anywhere near'' such a statement, which
      "would have been political suicide.''

      Stark's frank declaration that he is "a Unitarian who does not believe
      in a Supreme Being'' indicates, says Newman, that a significant page
      has been turned -- and maybe it's not such a political liability anymore.

      But he adds that "time will tell whether this is a case of the Bay
      Area being far out front -- or merely far out.''

      Stark's spiritual inclinations were sought by the Secular Coalition
      for America, an association of eight atheist and humanist groups,
      which offered a $1,000 prize to the person who could identify the
      "highest level atheist, agnostic, humanist or any other kind of
      nontheist currently holding elected public office in the United States."

      The 18-term Democratic congressman, who chairs the health subcommittee
      of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, agreed to fill out the
      coalition's survey on his religious beliefs. In a statement issued
      Monday, the 75-year-old Stark added that, "like our nation's founders,
      I strongly support the separation of church and state. I look forward
      to working with the Secular Coalition to stop the promotion of narrow
      religious beliefs in science, marriage contracts, the military and the
      provision of social services."

      A spokesman for Stark said Tuesday that he would have nothing further
      to say on the matter.

      The declaration made Stark a hero to atheist groups around the nation,
      which have had little visibility in debates on issues surrounding
      religion and values in Washington.

      The American Humanist Association marked the occasion with plans to
      run an ad in the Washington Post naming other famed atheists, such as
      author Kurt Vonnegut and "Saturday Night Live" comedian Julia Sweeney.

      Stark isn't the first California politician to say he is a
      nonbeliever: California Gov. Culbert Olson, a Democrat who served from
      1939 to 1943 -- and though born of Mormon parents -- said he was an
      atheist.

      But such a declaration carries plenty of political risk. Last month, a
      USA Today/Gallup poll noted that fewer than half of Americans said
      they would vote for an atheist candidate for president even if he were
      "well qualified." In the same poll, 95 percent said they would vote
      for a similarly qualified Catholic candidate, 92 percent for a Jewish
      candidate and 72 percent for a Mormon candidate.

      Newman says the poll shows that "anti-atheism remains the last
      remaining prejudice that a majority of Americans don't mind fessing up
      to,'' at least to a pollster. And he says the comments by Stark belie
      "the recent trend which has been in the direction of candidates
      increasingly wearing their religion on their sleeve.''

      Fred Edwords, a spokesman for the American Humanist Association, told
      the Los Angeles Times that he hopes Stark's identification will end
      discrimination against atheists.

      "So often throughout American history, people who are nontheistic or
      don't believe in a supreme being can't get elected to public office
      or, if they inform the public of their view, they don't get
      re-elected, Edwords said. "We're trying to increase the acceptance of
      nontheists as every bit as American as everybody else."

      Pollster Ben Tulchin of the San Francisco firm of Greenberg Quinlan
      and Rosner Research said Stark's comments also dramatize the unusual
      status of California as a state where religious beliefs do not take
      overwhelming precedence in voters' minds.

      He said his firm's long work in polling has repeatedly confirmed that
      the West Coast is less religious than the East Coast, "and California
      in particular, is probably one of the most nonreligious states in the
      country -- maybe the most nonreligious state.''

      He said that in polling in California "we rarely target voters by
      religion.''

      "In any other state, it's a very useful target in terms of
      understanding people's values and beliefs,'' Tulchin said.

      That doesn't mean Californians "are not religious, don't believe in
      God, or don't go to services,'' he cautioned. For example, he said,
      "you have a fast-growing population in Latinos, and religion does
      matter to them, and religious issues matter to them.''

      "But on a day-to-day basis, religion doesn't play a significant role
      in most Californians' lives in a way that shapes their politics on a
      daily basis,'' he said.

      Tulchin acknowledged that it is easier for Stark to state his
      religious beliefs in part because he lives in an overwhelmingly
      Democratic East Bay district where his re-election has been virtually
      guaranteed for decades.

      "In a safe district, it means it's less of a potential problem for him
      than other places,'' he said. "The fact that he's held office for a
      long time and has been re-elected over and over again will not change
      his relationship with most voters who have been with him for years.''

      Still, "if he were to run for office for the first time, even as a
      Democrat, that could complicate things ... and made people take a
      closer look,'' he said.

      This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle [i]

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/14/MNG7BOKV111.DTL
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.