Re: [scrumdevelopment] Scheduling Defect Fixes
- Hello, Roy. On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 10:16:18 AM, you
> I assume that your implication, Ron, is that it is only if INo ... I want only to be understood, not agreed with. I took you to
> agree with you that I have progressed towards greater understanding.
be saying that you understood my position (and, I freely grant, I
also took you to be saying that you found agreement as well, if not
Again I read venom into your words. Perhaps none was intended.
Do only what is necessary. Keep only what you need.
Although, this is not Twitter. I really want to do a +1.>>It (and the length of this thread) is a great illustration of why I recommend that teams not get too wrapped up in estimation. They start looking for numerical precision, and that starts consuming the energy that could be put toward accomplish goals.
Echoes my thoughts completely. Won't have been able to put it better myself.