Re: [scrumdevelopment] Scheduling Defect Fixes
- Hello, Roy. On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 9:35:37 AM, you
> Oh, all quite clear and straightforward, and in no way inI do not know. I hear the intense bitterness in your words, but have
> disagreement with my view, so I just have to wonder where the
> controversy is that has caused such a long, and sometimes very
> argumentative and almost bitter discussion.
absolutely no idea of their source. I can only imagine that they
stem from something local to you.
>Then, since that's what I've said in about the last four emails, why
> Item 4 is where I have suggested that we make a User Story of a
> defect, place it in the backlog, estimate it if you care to (by
> giving it Story Points). Items 1, 2 and 3 have never been in
> dispute, or at least, have never been diagreed with or
> contradicted in anything I have said.
are you still disputing, typing in capital letters, and offering
thinly veiled insults?
Show me the features!
Although, this is not Twitter. I really want to do a +1.>>It (and the length of this thread) is a great illustration of why I recommend that teams not get too wrapped up in estimation. They start looking for numerical precision, and that starts consuming the energy that could be put toward accomplish goals.
Echoes my thoughts completely. Won't have been able to put it better myself.