Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: story template abuse (was Re: [scrumdevelopment] Letting attacks go unchallenged)

Expand Messages
  • Thomasjeffreyandersontwin@Gmail.com
    Yes the whole as I, then I , so I is really irritating. I feel a kid being made to write I must not do X a 1000 times in a chalkboard. A like the invest
    Message 1 of 76 , Feb 1, 2010
      Yes the whole as I, then I , so I is really irritating.

      I feel a kid being made to write "I must not do X" a 1000 times in a chalkboard. A like the invest advice much better...


      On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Michael James <michael@...> wrote:


      On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Steve Ropa wrote:

      > For instance, I have seen some of the most amusing stories twisted around only so that they can fit the "As a ___, I can ___ so that___" model. Would it really have ended life as we know it if the story did not meet that form? And yes, I've even seen people insist on rejecting stories that don't follow the form....

      That's great, since user stories aren't even part of Scrum. I remember sitting in on a planning meeting where every PBI was actually a task, but started with "As a company, we want ____." They'd missed the whole point, and had no idea about INVEST (Independent Negotiable Valuable Estimable Small, and Testable) stories.

      Another company had their architects assign estimates to all the PBIs using Fibonacci numbers.

      Let's call these situations "mechanical implementations. " The whole point of Scrum is that it does not prescribe many "how" practices. Teams have to think for themselves.


    • Peter Stevens (calendar)
      ... Why does a wardrobe malfunction produce a massive emotional response
      Message 76 of 76 , Feb 7, 2010

        Doesn't it seem a bit disproportionate, though? It does to me. I too
        am curious what aspect of the human condition causes us to attribute
        so much power to these words. The word "fuck" for example - though it
        has an accepted definition in common use its meaning is entirely
        contextual. It doesn't even convey a useful concept, therefore. So,
        why is its presence in speech (or writing) so important to us?


        Why does a "wardrobe malfunction" produce a massive emotional response including congressional investigations? Beats me. Probably has something to do with the Puritans and maybe that repression amplifies the response.

        Having said that, I do live in a less prudish part of the world (more sex on TV, more tolerance for public nudism, less sensitivity to obscene language). Even here, scatological references don't have much place in public discourse - you might occasionally hear 'Scheisse' from a politician's mouth, but it's an exception.

        An interesting question is why modesty developed, why it lives on, and whether it will survive the Internet. It seems pretty deeply rooted, but I think that question belongs on a different list...

        Peter Stevens, CSM, CSPO, CSP
        tel: +41 44 586 6450 
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.