Re: One team with multiple projects
- One of the key benefits for the team of Scrum is the ability to focus and work collaboratively. More than one stream of work in single sprint inevitably reduces this significantly.
The beauty of Sprints, particularly short sprints (1 or 2 weeks) is that you can work alternatively one sprint on each work stream this ties up the PO for less time and they can focus on `their' sprint. It also gives more time to prepare for `their' sprint and to digest the output of their sprint.
If, for example, the ratio of work from the two POs is more 2:1 than 1:1, then alternate the sprints in the appropriate ratio.
I've coached several teams in this way of working, with real benefits - I have called it `TriLine' as in 3 lines... and rugby's try-line!
You can see more here... http://agilechange.com/wp/?page_id=76
--- In email@example.com, "brian_bofu" <brian.fu@...> wrote:
> We have a team working on two projects in the same Sprint, one development project and one support project. Unfortunately the team has 2 PO.
> The POs are able to manage priorities in Sprint Planning, and the team has one consolidated Sprint backlog, and thus with one Sprint burndown which the team update every day.
> But one PO requested to have a separate Sprint burndown for each project, since he can not have a sense of the progress from a mixed Sprint burndown.
> Any thoughts with it?