Re: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Extending a Sprint
- On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:47 AM, George Dinwiddie wrote:
> BTW, I've seen teams do certain stories at the beginning of theThis is how I recall handling this while on a Scrum dev team.
> taking them to done-done to meet a mid-sprint release, and then
> continuing with the rest of the stories in the sprint. It causes a
> little extra work, but came out pretty well.
Acceptance criteria included "Deployed/released on x date", where x is
within the Sprint. I don't recall it causing any real problem. This
would allow the Sprint duration to stay constant.
. An example checklist for serious ScrumMasters: http://tinyurl.com/cvdwor
- Hello, Jim. On Wednesday, July 1, 2009, at 11:45:39 AM, you wrote:
> I strongly recommend against extending a Sprint.Per a chat with Chet: I would not at all recommend extending a
Sprint while in the middle of it. I'm much less troubled by saying
"This next Sprint will be N days long because <some external
If another does not intend offense, it is wrong for me to seek it;
if another does indeed intend offense, it is foolish for me to permit it.
-- Kelly Easterley