Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: DOD vs acceptance criteria

Expand Messages
  • Morten Haug
    +1 on this. Brief summary: Definition of Done - *how* Acceptance Criteria - *what* Best regards, Morten Haug http://www.haugern.net/blog
    Message 1 of 36 , Jun 24, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      +1 on this. Brief summary:

      Definition of Done - *how*
      Acceptance Criteria - *what*

      Best regards,
      Morten Haug
      http://www.haugern.net/blog
      http://twitter.com/haugern

      --- In scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com, "jmilunsky" <jack@...> wrote:
      >
      > In my humble opinion, acceptance criteria relate to details on how the feature or user story functions i.e. the implementation has to work this way before the user accepts it
      >
      > definiion of done relates more to feature quality and completeness, i.e. unit tested, functionally tested, documented, version controlled, peer reviewed etc
      >
      > hope this helps
      > jack
      > twitter.com/agilebuddy
      > blog.agilebuddy.com
      >
      > --- In scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com, Vikas Atri <vikasait25@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Hi All,
      > >
      > > Can anyone please give me some inputs on DOD(definition of done)�vs acceptance criteria?
      > >
      > > Regards,
      > > Vikas
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ________________________________
      > > From: Vikas Atri <vikasait25@>
      > > To: scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com
      > > Sent: Friday, 5 June, 2009 4:07:02 PM
      > > Subject: [scrumdevelopment] DOD vs acceptance criteria
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Dear All,
      > >
      > > Thanks for the inputs on feature vs user stroy.
      > > I think, it is a debatable topic, but I see that most of people on this forum agree that user story is what we first get from the customer or product user.
      > > Ryan : Your inputs are convincing and that ends the debate..
      > >
      > > Also till now, I understoodthat there is acceptance criteria for every user story or feature
      > > being implemented in sprint.This concept is important from perspective that
      > > every feature or user story being developed must be demonstrable.
      > > But there is something I learnt from one of team members was
      > > DOD : definition of done.
      > > Has anyone of you ever heard of it?Is it different from acceptance criteria.
      > > Seeking guidance on the same.
      > > Regards,
      > > Vikas
      > >
      > > ________________________________
      > > Bollywood news, movie reviews, film trailers and more! Click here.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel http://in.travel..yahoo.com/
      > >
      >
    • Morten Haug
      +1 on this. Brief summary: Definition of Done - *how* Acceptance Criteria - *what* Best regards, Morten Haug http://www.haugern.net/blog
      Message 36 of 36 , Jun 24, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        +1 on this. Brief summary:

        Definition of Done - *how*
        Acceptance Criteria - *what*

        Best regards,
        Morten Haug
        http://www.haugern.net/blog
        http://twitter.com/haugern

        --- In scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com, "jmilunsky" <jack@...> wrote:
        >
        > In my humble opinion, acceptance criteria relate to details on how the feature or user story functions i.e. the implementation has to work this way before the user accepts it
        >
        > definiion of done relates more to feature quality and completeness, i.e. unit tested, functionally tested, documented, version controlled, peer reviewed etc
        >
        > hope this helps
        > jack
        > twitter.com/agilebuddy
        > blog.agilebuddy.com
        >
        > --- In scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com, Vikas Atri <vikasait25@> wrote:
        > >
        > > Hi All,
        > >
        > > Can anyone please give me some inputs on DOD(definition of done)�vs acceptance criteria?
        > >
        > > Regards,
        > > Vikas
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > ________________________________
        > > From: Vikas Atri <vikasait25@>
        > > To: scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com
        > > Sent: Friday, 5 June, 2009 4:07:02 PM
        > > Subject: [scrumdevelopment] DOD vs acceptance criteria
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > Dear All,
        > >
        > > Thanks for the inputs on feature vs user stroy.
        > > I think, it is a debatable topic, but I see that most of people on this forum agree that user story is what we first get from the customer or product user.
        > > Ryan : Your inputs are convincing and that ends the debate..
        > >
        > > Also till now, I understoodthat there is acceptance criteria for every user story or feature
        > > being implemented in sprint.This concept is important from perspective that
        > > every feature or user story being developed must be demonstrable.
        > > But there is something I learnt from one of team members was
        > > DOD : definition of done.
        > > Has anyone of you ever heard of it?Is it different from acceptance criteria.
        > > Seeking guidance on the same.
        > > Regards,
        > > Vikas
        > >
        > > ________________________________
        > > Bollywood news, movie reviews, film trailers and more! Click here.
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel http://in.travel..yahoo.com/
        > >
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.