Re: [scrumdevelopment] Company Standards (Was Re:Voting the entire team off the island)
- Tobias Mayer wrote:
> Ron, Ilja,To me it seems like the controversy mainly is about how useful they
> Mark's point about following company standards is a reasonable one.
> They exist. Sometimes they are useful.
really are. I understood Mark to say that we, for example, *should* have
a company standard on what logging framework to use. I find that to be
highly questionable advice.
- On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Emiliano Heyns <Emiliano.Heyns@...> wrote:On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Ilja Preuss <it@...> wrote:Emiliano Heyns wrote:How visible is that progress? How visible is how much needs still to be
> Do I want them to behave differently... that is a very good question. I
> think (easy to say) I would be OK with a wide variety of behaviors as
> long as we're showing noticeable progress towards our projects' goal.
done to reach that goal? Is this reflected in some kind of burn chart
that the team members believe in?
I'm beginning to doubt this. We have something like this, but I wonder whether the value of the milestones is adequately explained, which could certainly be an issue for the new member. If not, it could explain a thing or two.
I've been reading Jean Tabaka's book; I forgot who recommended it to me, but here's a heart-felt thank you to whoever did. I've found "a thing or two" that I should have handled very, very differently. So my apologies to this group, after the apologies already rendered to my team. We're not at the performing stage yet, but in a lot better shape than we were.