Re: [scrumdevelopment] Consistent sprint lengths
>If you search the archive of this list you will find a multitude of
> Why is consistent sprint length so important? Are there exceptions
> (like different points in the project)?
answers. The one I like to give most is:
2.) Batch sizes (amount of work you do)
5.) Self-organisation patterns that develop.
By having a steady heartbeat your team can feel at ease in the
environment they have to work in. There is no reason at all to have
varying sprint lengths. If you started out with 20 days and after 5
sprints your teams wants to go to 10day sprints, by all means do.
Sent from gmail so do not trust this communication.
Do not send me sensitive information here, ask for my none-gmail accounts.
"Therefore the considerations of the intelligent always include both
benefit and harm." - Sun Tzu
- From my experience, sprint lenght consistency is important because it allows there to be estimation set on certain products in the backlog based on their priority in the list.If you were to change length of the sprint each time , it would never allow for accurate destimation because there would never be a proper determination of how many story points should go into each sprint.The books I've read have all said that sprint go 4 weeks , but our team is using 2 week sprints since we started and find them working well.Tony
CJ <laraidah@...> wrote:Why is consistent sprint length so important? Are there exceptions
(like different points in the project)?
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
- Another aspect is the external view of your project: it is much easier
to make outside stakeholders shut up for a while if you give them a
clear picture of when they can influence the project and especially
when they will receive feedback.
Consider the following situation as an example:
You are in a "consolidating middleware project". Your product
communicates with a multitude of backend systems and is used by quite
a number of different frontends. Typically one fronted is for one
specific customer and often associated with one distinct backend.
If you are trying to co-ordinate the different customers as well as
the different systems it will help you very much if you can tell these
outsiders: OK, but we have a 3-week rhythm of delivering results.
In this example the other systems didn't use scrum and were not part
of our organization. But at the point they understood that this rhythm
is short enough to adapt to customer's delivery wishes and also long
enough to get productive in developping, they were really happy and
synchronized with our beat.
Hope this helps illustrating the importance.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, tony pagliocco >
> The books I've read have all said that sprint go 4 weeks , but ourteam is using 2 week sprints since we started and find them working well.
Same here. We started with 4 weeks but it didn't work well. On Mike
Cohn's advice we switched to 2 weeks and it worked great for more than
a year now on few projects. But now on one project we've even switched
to 1 week sprints and first impressions of the team are quite positive.
> CJ <laraidah@...> wrote:
> Why is consistent sprint length so important? Are there
> (like different points in the project)?Try it now.
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.