RE: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Comments on Silver Bullets
- I think we might get Coors to include us.
From: fredb001 [mailto:fredb001@...]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 10:17 PM
Subject: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Comments on Silver Bullets
Great article. Thank you!
> The belief that there will be some magicalI remember reading that the first programming language in the late
> incantation, tool, or facility that will kill the difficulty of >
> software development has haunted our industry as long as I've been
> developing software, and I remember the 60's.
40's was thought to signify the end of the need for programmers.
> Remember heavyweight methodologies?All too well. All too painfully. I'm afraid heavyweight
methodologies' legacy is an aversion to any methodology at all. Not
that this aversion wasn't present to begin with. But I'd say
heavyweight methodologies reinforced it dramatically at every level
in the organization: the programmers didn't like using them and
management didn't like the drop in productivity.
> Agile processes are sometimes thought of as silver bullets.Being a silver bullet does seem to be the chief criticism leveled at
agile processes -- at least the opening volley. "Look at the new
cure-all fad they're trying to foist on us." (The middle of these
arguments is usually "It's just commonsense" and end with "Of
course, we were doing it this way all along.")
> The reason is the shortage of people who know what they are doing.Truer words were never spoken. Also, I think things would be more
hopeful if a lot more people know, as Phil Armour might put it, that
they don't know what they are doing.
In particular, I hope the last four paragraphs get the widest
circulation possible. Maybe we could all pitch in for a spot during
the Super Bowl?
To Post a message, send it to: scrumdevelopment@...
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: