RE: [scrumdevelopment] Re: We want an SLA: item on the product backlog?
SLA’s are funny creatures. In theory they should be made by the Product owner to the customer, given that the product owner is part of the organization creating the product. If however, the Product owner is the actual customer, then I would suggest that the team include a person whose domain is the legal and financial aspects of what you are providing. Why? In both scenarios the following three issues need to be considerd.
First there is money involved and that is not something most development teams deal with, so you need a team member with that domain experience
Second there are lawyers or at least the probability that lawyers are involved. Better to have one as a team member so they can represent you appropriately.
Finally there are sales and marketing people involved. They have goals and objectives that may be in conflict with what you feel can be done. This is where the impediment handling skills of the scrum master get expanded.
Michael F. Dwyer
"Planning constantly peers into the future for indications as to where a solution may emerge."
"A Plan is a complex situation, adapting to an emerging solution."
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Peter Hundermark
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: [scrumdevelopment] Re: We want an SLA: item on the product backlog?
--- In scrumdevelopment@ yahoogroups. com, Patrick Debois
<Patrick.Debois@ ...> wrote:
> Where you put the requirement of 'we want an SLA'. It is not really
> functional item. Still you might get a user story on how this wouldbe
> I know an SLA is not so important in a development part of a
> But if you are delivering services f.i. webservices or anotherwebsite,
> this can be an integral part of your project. So I guess I'mlooking at
> applying Scrum as a general methodology not only in the developmentcycle.
> * Would it make sense to have an SLA defined for each sprint?
> beyond deployment but also service the application)that
> * Or would you just leave it on the product backlog?
> * Maybe you don't put on the product backlog, but just define
> the item is part of the definition of done during a sprint?Patrick,
> Any comments are welcome,
Isn't the SLA that applies to the team for the sprint (and hopefully
for the whole release) the team and PO's agreement on what DONE means?
Or did I misunderstand your question?