Our sprints are 30 days. I had thought a 6 hr meeting is appropriate
(average) for a sprint of that size.
On Jul 24, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Ilja Preuss wrote:
> Some of the
business folks at my company feel the sprint planning
> meetings are too expensive. They're wanting
to shorten them (from
> what generally takes 4 to 6 hrs) down to a
smaller amount of time by
> having discussions off-line before the
meeting with engineering.
> Then they want to come to the planning
meeting and let the business
> owner present to the whole team what it is
they want to have
> developed, and then engineer they worked with
present what tasks they
> felt were necessary. Then allow the team as a
whole to discuss if
> there is agreement or if tasks need to be
changed or added/deleted.
> I'd first try to make the meeting itself more
Why is it taking that long? (And how long are your
> Anyone have thoughts on this?