RE: [scrumdevelopment] academic research
- I am not so sure there is a "scientific" method to compare development
processes, at least from an Agile perspective. Agilism looks at interaction,
communication && non-communication and promotes the game of co-operation.
Akin to the Symbolic Interactionists in Sociological research and
methodology Agilists "focus on the subjective aspects of social life, rather
than on objective, macro-structural aspects of social systems." Actors
continually adjust their behaviour to the actions of others through
interpretation and the realisation of self. Your research should thus be
more qualitative than quantative.
From: Julio Hartmann [mailto:jhartmann@...]
Sent: 03 April 2003 13:30
Subject: [scrumdevelopment] academic research
I'm a Master Degree Student in Computer Science, and I'm planning to
research the agile software development methods. I'm not really sure what to
do yet. Because the agile publications are very new, there is few academic
resources on the subject. I wonder if you heard of any academic research
going on related to Scrum or other agile methods?
Any ideas would be appreciated. Maybe I could make a comparison
several methods, such as Scrum, XP and FDD. But for doing that, I would have
to use a scientific way to compare the methods. Or maybe I can use a well
known process framework as the baseline for the comparison.
To Post a message, send it to: scrumdevelopment@...
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> I think it is fine to assume that it is "independentAgreed!
> thinking". This is a good thing because it confirms
> that at least 2 people can reach the same conclusions
> and can validate their experiences and explain
> the world the same way.
> (You could alwaysI think we struggle with researching "previous art" because most of the
> ask the question the other way: Is the stuff
> from "Growing Software" coming from somewhere else
> since our stuff was published 5-7 years ago
> i.e. PLOP3 proceedings, PLOPD4 book, etc. I think
> it is safe to assume "independent thinking" because
> our industry is famous for not researching
> "previous art". In hard Science this would actually
> be an embarrassment.)
leading agile thinkers are in the trenches, not in academia. This is why I was
excited when I saw the overlap between the Scrum book and "Growing
Software". I figured that both the Scrum folks and Roy had probably not had
the opportunity to find each other.
I look forward to the outcome of future collaborations between agile thinkers
who find complexity science applicable to software development.