56469Re: Scrum in non-co-located, non-overlapping teams? (was: Meeting minutes for stand up meetings
- Jan 3, 2013<sarcasm>
It must be the 5x cost savings. (Rolls eyes).
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Ron Jeffries wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> > Good to know, thanx. Sometimes the discussions in this group can give the impression that "everyone" can do Scrum if they just apply sufficient effort, so it's good to see recognition of situations where it can't be applied - and that there are effective alternatives.
> Well, one could argue (and this one would) that refusal to collocate the team constitutes insufficient effort. That said, there are many decent ways to build software and if a company chooses for some reason to use extremely distributed teams (despite the 4X or greater performance decline), then Scrum may not be a good choice for them.
> Ron Jeffries
> Impossible is not a fact. It is an opinion. -- Muhammad Ali
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>