38295Re: Scrum User Group Closes
- May 2, 2009Hi Beckford,
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "beckfordp@..." <beckfordp@...> wrote:
> If this is so, why not just publish the letter so we can all decide for ourselves? On this forum would be a good place to start. I've followed the discussion and haven't found a reference to the actual letter in question anywhere.
As others have pointed out, it was published, both here and on the SA site. In addition, I posted a copy of the one that was posted here to http://coryfoy.com/ScrumAgreement.pdf
> At best this is a PR fiasco for the SA. At worst it smells of something pretty horrid.
It's not horrid, but it was a goof. I'm working with the SA to correct that.
> I can't see any good reason why the SA would want to trademark any phrase that included the term "User Group".
See the last post I made to the group. Basically there is a very good reason why they would that wasn't obvious to me at the time until it was explained.
I agree with Tobias that we should step back until after the board meets on Monday and I meet with Jim on Tuesday. I think things will clear up after that.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>