31477Re: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Performance measurement of team members?
- Jul 31, 2008On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:38 PM, gdinwiddie <lists@...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "John Bradway" <jbradway@...>It's the individual performance measurement that's forced. I'd much
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Johanna Rothman <jr@...> wrote:
>> > This is where one-on-ones with a manager can help. The manager can
>> > elicit data, which will help with feedback, the get-well plans, and
>> > possibly the team's perspective. But the manager has to have one-on-
>> > ones with everyone, *and* keep notes on everyone's performance, or the
>> > under-performer might have a case for discrimination.
>> This is the exactly the approach we've been "forced" to adopt.
>> Thankfully it's never a permanent situation.
> John, could you clarify this for me? Are you saying you've been
> "forced" by the situation to adopt having one-on-ones with a manager
> but that you don't plan to continue doing so after you've gotten rid
> of the bad eggs?
rather track this at the team level once the eggs are removed.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>