25604Re: Product Owner as Scrum Coach
- Dec 3, 2007--- In email@example.com, "Wolfgang Schulze Zachau"
> if Scrum is done properly, then the PO has no say into how the teamdeliver
> their stuff.You mean "no say" other than nixing the project because it is no longer
feasible given the estimates that the team delivered? Or (if the PO is
also the business owner) nixing the team and starting over with a new
team? (admittedly one that will be set up for failure from day 1)
>In other words: in this case the PO deserves to have his knucklesrapped. Properly.
While a rapping of the knuckles is sure to be communicative, it might be
better to have a sit down and explain *why* the team is defining DONE as
including tests etc. It shouldn't be too difficult to explain in a way
that makes good business sense... particularly since it *does* make
good business sense to test properly right?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>