25032Re: Potentially releasable software
- Nov 7 9:13 PM--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Jeff Heinen" <jheinen@...> wrote:
>Yes, exactly. Every feature shown should be "done/done/done", not
> I've found it useful to use the distinction of "potentially releasable"
> vs. "sellable."
just the smoke and mirrors of untested code. Whether it's sufficiently
feature rich to release is a Product Owner call. Sometimes we need
a "stabilization Sprint" for polish, not deferred testing.
- << Previous post in topic