Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

25032Re: Potentially releasable software

Expand Messages
  • Michael James
    Nov 7, 2007
      --- In scrumdevelopment@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Heinen" <jheinen@...> wrote:
      > I've found it useful to use the distinction of "potentially releasable"
      > vs. "sellable."

      Yes, exactly. Every feature shown should be "done/done/done", not
      just the smoke and mirrors of untested code. Whether it's sufficiently
      feature rich to release is a Product Owner call. Sometimes we need
      a "stabilization Sprint" for polish, not deferred testing.

    • Show all 20 messages in this topic