Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

22771Re: AW: [scrumdevelopment] Who has the last say?

Expand Messages
  • Bas Vodde
    Aug 1, 2007
      Hi,

      Totally agree. It's the profession of software developers to develop
      good quality software.

      Bas

      Heber Ferraz-Leite wrote:
      >
      >
      > This has been a while ago, as I'm cathing up on 700+ emails ... But I'd
      > still like to comment.
      >
      > <<< Who's jurisdiction is the final say as to what is developed? Surely
      > the team cannot decline Option A for the perceived quality that
      > Option B will provide as it will lose the company business. >>>
      >
      > Everybody seems to have named the PO ... But I think it is dangerous to put
      > it that way, as it may bring the thinking of "cut quality to meet the
      > deadline" into scrum. The PO is responsible for the stories implemented,
      > but not for the way they are implemented. How things are technically
      > implemented is a decision of the team.
      >
      > The PO should say what exact functionality is expected, define priorities,
      > etc. ... And then it's the team's job to commit to something that can be
      > delivered with good quality. It's the scrummasters role to make sure that
      > these rules are adhered to.
      >
      > I don't think that the PO should have the option to say "I want it delivered
      > with poorer quality", because the customer that the PO is delivering to will
      > certainly not expect poorer quality. Reducing quality may help you make a
      > short term presentation, but in the long term it will create more costs
      > because of bugfixing, poorer code maintenance, and loss of reputation for
      > your company.
      >
      > If the POs requirements cannot be commited to within a certain timeframe,
      > it's the PO's job to reduce the requirements (or simplify them) so that they
      > can be met, and outline a roadmap for the rest.
      >
      > So ... It's the PO's call what will be implemented ... But it's not anyone's
      > call to reduce quality. The call the PO needs to make is to reduce
      > complexity, or choose not to reduce complexity and show less functionality
      > at his demo ... With a roadmap for the implementation of the rest.
      >
      > Regards,
      >
      > Heber
      >
      >
    • Show all 12 messages in this topic