2126RE: [scrumdevelopment] Bombastic
- Nov 2, 2003A six week sprint is long enough that the team starts to require
documentation, additional models, additional communication vehicles to
remind them of their prior work and decisions. Sprints can be longer or
shorter than thirty calendar days, but each direction has its downside and
loss of productivity and collaboration. However, the world isn't optimal
From: Ron Jeffries [mailto:ronjeffries@...]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [scrumdevelopment] Bombastic
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 12:36:51 PM, Jim McCusker wrote:
> I was actually wondering what the community's view was if someone were
> to add 2 weeks to a sprint - mostly because the time given from start to
> code freeze was 6 weeks instead of 30 days.
Two shorter sprints would provide better feedback and more flexibility on
the part of the PM.
Do, or do not. There is no try. --Yoda
To Post a message, send it to: scrumdevelopment@...
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- << Previous post in topic