Re: Spam e-mails
- Gentlemen: I will gladly help out and be a moderator if you need one.
I am a regular reader but not a poster. Email me offline if you want
me to moderate and need my bona fides.
--- In email@example.com, "Greg Franck-Weiby"
>NON moneyer messages form the list that are spam. This way, they do
> Greetings from Ian to Gryffri and all,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gryffri Newmarch
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 4:34 PM
> Subject: RE: [sca_moneyer] Spam e-mails
> >One feature of moderator is the joy of going in and deleting the
not appear in the digest.
>many Yahoo lists), we moderators don't actually have to delete the
> - If I correctly understood the post for Hrothgar (who moderates
spam messages we receive in messages to 'list owner' to keep them
from going out to the list.
>would perhaps just verify that the person is really involved somehow
> >I think it would be better if perhaps those approving membership
>that the Viagra ad spam hasn't been coming from subscribers - my
> - That's what I've been doing - and if my impression is correct
quizzing subscription applicants has been successful.
>to moderate, nor delete spam for everyone else's benefit.
> >However, perhaps I am just chaffed, because I don't really want
>moderating, I'm guessing that you can tell Yahoo to remove you from
> - If you want to retire or take a well deserved vacation from
their list of moderators for this list. In that case, you'll still
receive the legitimate moneying related posts from the list (as well
as posting yourself), but you won't receive the spam messages sent
to 'list owner' for review.
>level officer, my duties have kept me from actively participating
> >Looking back over the past four years since I became a kingdom
here on the list. I stepped down in June and have no plans to return
to Kingdom level service. Frazzled and worn now. Spam worn and
returning the hobby older and tired, perhaps just disjoining myself
from the list is better yet the solution.
>better on paper anyhow.
> - Well, disjoining from moderating, if not the general list.
> >Less mail that way. I apologize for the snappy words. I write
>moderating, that just leaves me and Emmerich. I <think> we can
> -Understood - with sympathy
> Well, with Chuck being inactive, if Gryffri retires from
handle it. What do you think, Emmerich?
>subscription rules or kick any current subscribers off the list. How
> As for myself, I'm not presently seeing a need to change
about you, Emmerich?
> Visit Your Group
> SPONSORED LINKS
> a.. Credit history
> b.. Vehicle history
> c.. Vehicle history report
> d.. Vehicle history search
> e.. Vehicle history vin
> Yahoo! News
> Top Stories
> Get the current
> top news stories
> Yahoo! Avatars
> Share Your Style
> Show your face in
> Messenger & more.
> Yahoo! TV
> Want the scoop?
> Check out today's
> news and gossip.