two tiny comments on names
- Just catching up on the digests and there are two things I'd like to
To Robert the lost (Re: Name Game Question):
> Hum, kinda dont like the helms they wore lol. But I do like the ideaKeep in mind that, as far as I know, mercenaries were pretty much
> that they started as mercenaries at first. Just dont like that I
> havent read anything about them using bows.
considered scum in Japan. Come to think of it, I can't think of any
military culture where they were much respected. Your modern persona
(i.e. you) can think it's cool, but your Japanese persona would want to
avoid mentioning that aspect of his history. Anyway, not liking their
helms is as good a reason as any to avoid that! :)
To Red Dawg (Re: Re: [SCA-JML] Possible Objection to Takeshita):
> So I have been thinking along the lines of some famous sumo who haveSumo names are awfully modern and gimicky, so it may be risky to base
> names that translate to things like mountain that rizes from the sea.
> not this particular one but along that line, any suggestions?
your study on them. On the other hand they do give you the idea of one
form of historical name, which has to do with the natural world and a
pattern of two words together (morimoto, ookawa, honda, and tanaka are
modern examples). However there were plenty of other historical names
that don't follow this pattern.
We modern North Americans tend to be biased toward the names we think
are pretty, that mean "morning flower" or "mountain pine," and anything
with "wolf" or "dragon" in them, but that's not necessarily an accurate
historical recreation (especially the wolf and dragon thing). We do
the same thing with the European names, which is why we end up with a
dozen Anguses and no Galfrids. And to tell the truth, modern Japanese
naming trends are the same way. So, the sumo pattern might be a good
start but there's a lot more available if you dig a little.