Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [SCA-JML] Re: Re: Heisig's Method for Learning Kanji

Expand Messages
  • Ii Saburou
    ... That s actually how my class went: learn hiragana, and then start on learning katakana, words, and grammar. Learning a word almost always included the
    Message 1 of 26 , Jan 2, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      On Sat, 1 Jan 2005, Anthony Bryant wrote:

      > If people would only learn them in CONTEXT, as WORDS, that wouldn't pose the
      > problem. Too many textbooks treat kanji as strange animals to be avoided until
      > the second year. If I had my way, we'd be doing kanji from the second week,
      > after everyone has learned their kana. When you learn a new word, you should
      > learn its kanji as PART of that learning of the word. That's how Chinese works.
      > <shrug>

      That's actually how my class went: learn hiragana, and then start on
      learning katakana, words, and grammar. Learning a 'word' almost always
      included the kanji, unless that word is rarely written with kanji (e.g.
      'kore'--although there is a kanji, I don't think I've seen it used in a
      modern context).

      -Ii
    • Solveig
      Noble Cousin! Greetings from Solveig! ... What Japanese equivalents are you talking about? Every kanwajiten with which I am familiar shows usage and gives
      Message 2 of 26 , Jan 2, 2005
      • 0 Attachment
        Noble Cousin!

        Greetings from Solveig!

        >is not a complete reference like Nelson's only initially teaches one
        >meaning and a couple of pronunciations as well when they introduce a
        >character. So every other kanji instruction book has this one
        >shortcoming as well. Even Nelson's and many of the Japanese equivalents
        >are inadequate because they don't show actual usage.

        What "Japanese equivalents" are you talking about? Every kanwajiten with
        which I am familiar shows usage and gives multiple readings. Many give
        historical development of the character and identify the dynasty associated
        with each of the on'yomi readings.

        >No, but there are English equivalents for every common kanji meaning.

        No there are not. This is patently false. The canonical and well worn
        example is aoi.

        >The Chinese and Japanese are people from well developed societies, they
        >have concepts and thoughts very similar to their Western counterparts.
        >I'm not a subscriber to Nihonron or any of that silliness.

        I am not a subscriber to nihonron either, but the notion that Japanese and
        English are equivalent is laughable. There are things which are easier and
        more natural to express in each of these languages. Even if something can
        be easily expressed in both languages does not mean that you will see a
        1:1 word mapping.

        >Once you get to the level that you are worried about which kanji for
        >"hakaru" to use, you have far outgrown any kanji course I've ever
        >experienced or heard about. You need a real reading and writing course
        >and access to a good Japanese dictionary for Japanese with serious
        >examples of usage. Which means at that point you MUST have a basic grasp
        >of kanji.

        The amount of prior kanji knowledge required to use Kadokawa Kanwa Jiten
        is quite minimal.
        --

        Your Humble Servant
        Solveig Throndardottir
        Amateur Scholar

        +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
        | Barbara Nostrand, Ph.D. | Solveig Throndardottir, CoM, CoS, Fleur |
        | deMoivre Institute | Carolingia Statis Mentis Est |
        | mailto:nostrand@... | mailto:bnostran@... |
        +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
        | Note. Many popular "free" email services are automatically routed to the |
        | trash by my email filters. |
        +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
      • Solveig
        Baron Edward! Greetings from Solveig! ... At Harvard, you start learning kanji from about the first month. What they do at Harvard is not quite as radical as
        Message 3 of 26 , Jan 2, 2005
        • 0 Attachment
          Baron Edward!

          Greetings from Solveig!

          >If people would only learn them in CONTEXT, as WORDS, that wouldn't pose the
          >problem. Too many textbooks treat kanji as strange animals to be avoided until
          >the second year. If I had my way, we'd be doing kanji from the second week,
          >after everyone has learned their kana. When you learn a new word, you should
          >learn its kanji as PART of that learning of the word. That's how
          >Chinese works.

          At Harvard, you start learning kanji from about the first month. What they
          do at Harvard is not quite as radical as you propose, but you do learn a
          pile of kanji during the first semester even in the night school program.
          --

          Your Humble Servant
          Solveig Throndardottir
          Amateur Scholar

          +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          | Barbara Nostrand, Ph.D. | Solveig Throndardottir, CoM, CoS, Fleur |
          | deMoivre Institute | Carolingia Statis Mentis Est |
          | mailto:nostrand@... | mailto:bnostran@... |
          +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          | Note. Many popular "free" email services are automatically routed to the |
          | trash by my email filters. |
          +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
        • James Eckman
          ... I think one advantage of a course that concentrates on shapes, especially as short term as Heisig s is supposed to be is that it helps you recognize what
          Message 4 of 26 , Jan 2, 2005
          • 0 Attachment
            >From: Anthony Bryant <ajbryant@...>
            >
            >
            >That's one reason I object so strongly to many of the "learn kanji" books. They
            >all seem to focus on individual kanji, and this mysterious thing called
            >"readings." I really abhor the concept of this Heisig Method. It's totally the
            >wrong idea.
            >
            >
            I think one advantage of a course that concentrates on shapes,
            especially as short term as Heisig's is supposed to be is that it helps
            you recognize what the hell a kanji is. It's really nice to be able to
            look at a bunch of marks and break them up into the right units.
            Especially when written horizontally, this can be a real problem for
            beginners. Also having a rough idea of the meaning when it's used by
            itself is not bad either.

            >If people would only learn them in CONTEXT, as WORDS, that wouldn't pose the
            >problem. Too many textbooks treat kanji as strange animals to be avoided until
            >the second year.
            >
            Hell, some of the older textbooks treat KANA as strange animals which
            really sucks. Most textbooks I've run across don't have enough reading
            material unless you go out and buy kiddy books which until recently was
            only an option in a few US cities. One very positive effect of the
            internet is it's easier to get Japanese books and the number of sites
            keeps increasing. It's very easy to check meanings and pronounciations
            online, especially good if there are specialist words that are not used
            in normal conversation.

            >If I had my way, we'd be doing kanji from the second week,
            >after everyone has learned their kana. When you learn a new word, you should
            >learn its kanji as PART of that learning of the word. That's how Chinese works.
            >
            >
            Possibly why Madarin conversation classes are so popular as opposed to
            the other.

            Of course none of this helps Otagiri-dono who wants to spend some
            serious time self-studying Japanese. Which books would you recommend as
            an alternative? I really haven't run across any really good ones myself.
            I've just been very lucky to have had good teachers who supplement
            mediocre textbooks with lots of extra material. For those in the SF Bay
            area I highly recommend Soko Gakuen, they have a wide selection of
            beginner and intermediate classes and they are cheap.

            Jim Eckman
          • Anthony Bryant
            ... Excellent. I really wonder about the folks whose texts are in romaji through the first semester. That s severely crippling. Effingham -- Anthony J. Bryant
            Message 5 of 26 , Jan 2, 2005
            • 0 Attachment
              Solveig wrote:

              > At Harvard, you start learning kanji from about the first month. What they
              > do at Harvard is not quite as radical as you propose, but you do learn a
              > pile of kanji during the first semester even in the night school program.

              Excellent. I really wonder about the folks whose texts are in romaji through the
              first semester. That's severely crippling.

              Effingham
              --

              Anthony J. Bryant
              Website: http://www.sengokudaimyo.com

              Effingham's Heraldic Avatars (...and stuff):
              http://www.sengokudaimyo.com/avatarbiz.html

              Grand Cross, Order of the Laurel:
              http://www.cafepress.com/laurelorder
            • Solveig
              Noble Cousins! Greetings from Solveig! I hope to come out with a leaflet entitled Bunka sometime around SEP 1 of this year. Which name should I put on it?
              Message 6 of 26 , Jan 2, 2005
              • 0 Attachment
                Noble Cousins!

                Greetings from Solveig! I hope to come out with a leaflet entitled
                "Bunka" sometime around SEP 1 of this year. Which name should I put
                on it? Why or why not?
                --

                Your Humble Servant
                Solveig Throndardottir
                Amateur Scholar

                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                | Barbara Nostrand, Ph.D. | Solveig Throndardottir, CoM, CoS, Fleur |
                | deMoivre Institute | Carolingia Statis Mentis Est |
                | mailto:nostrand@... | mailto:bnostran@... |
                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                | Note. Many popular "free" email services are automatically routed to the |
                | trash by my email filters. |
                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
              • Otagiri Tatsuzou
                ... Ah ... there is no help for me. My swords are set in the obi as are the extra sandles. Foolish or not, I have already begun this journey. But if the
                Message 7 of 26 , Jan 2, 2005
                • 0 Attachment
                  > Of course none of this helps Otagiri-dono who wants to spend some
                  > serious time self-studying Japanese. Which books would you recommend as
                  > an alternative?

                  Ah ... there is no help for me. My swords are set in the obi as are
                  the extra sandles. Foolish or not, I have already begun this journey.
                  But if the learned on the list can provide references to alternate
                  approaches/books that can be used by rogue students, I am sure that
                  others might benefit (as will I if this path ends prematurely).

                  I have little doubt that an immersion method is superior in many
                  respects, but I don't see how to accomplish that alone and on the road.

                  (Tune of Green Acres)
                  Rote memorization is the way for me.
                  to learn two thousand Japanese kanji
                  Filling notepads,
                  with so many
                  Endless Repitition,
                  gives me the language key.

                  (now ... Live! in VA!) Otagiri
                • Ii Saburou
                  ... E.g. To Kiss --in Japanese you can say Kuchi(d)zukeru but it is not the same as to kiss , and when used in the English sense I ve most often seen the
                  Message 8 of 26 , Jan 3, 2005
                  • 0 Attachment
                    On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Solveig wrote:

                    >> The Chinese and Japanese are people from well developed societies, they
                    >> have concepts and thoughts very similar to their Western counterparts.
                    >> I'm not a subscriber to Nihonron or any of that silliness.
                    >
                    > I am not a subscriber to nihonron either, but the notion that Japanese and
                    > English are equivalent is laughable. There are things which are easier and
                    > more natural to express in each of these languages. Even if something can
                    > be easily expressed in both languages does not mean that you will see a
                    > 1:1 word mapping.

                    E.g. 'To Kiss'--in Japanese you can say 'Kuchi(d)zukeru' but it is not the
                    same as 'to kiss', and when used in the English sense I've most often seen
                    the English ('kisu') used.

                    -Ii
                  • James Eckman
                    ... I seem to remember period Japanese didn t kiss like Westerners, chalk up another one to corrupting Western influences ;) Most of our ancestors would not
                    Message 9 of 26 , Jan 4, 2005
                    • 0 Attachment
                      > From: Ii Saburou <logan@...>
                      >
                      >
                      >E.g. 'To Kiss'--in Japanese you can say 'Kuchi(d)zukeru' but it is not the
                      >same as 'to kiss', and when used in the English sense I've most often seen
                      >the English ('kisu') used.
                      >
                      >
                      I seem to remember period Japanese didn't kiss like Westerners, chalk up
                      another one to corrupting Western influences ;) Most of our ancestors
                      would not understand many of our practices either. Hollywood, tourism
                      and everything else has radically changed the modern Japanese in a very
                      short period of time.

                      > From: Solveig <nostrand@...>
                      >
                      >Greetings from Solveig! The Japanese were doing a very good job of nibbling
                      >away at China until the U.S. intervened in the late 1930's early 1940's.
                      >
                      >
                      Even afterwards. The current government had really lost the mandate of
                      heaven!

                      > From: Solveig <nostrand@...>
                      >
                      >Invading Korea and China was quite rational and a far better alternative
                      >than trying to follow the example of the Minamoto following the Genpei War.
                      >Basically, the Japanese had raised huge armies which expected loot. Not
                      >to mention the large number off defeated soldiers who needed someplace to
                      >go.
                      >
                      >
                      I agree, this is a very important reason. They really didn't do so badly
                      except that the Japanese naval forces stunk, this is not good for over
                      the water invasions.

                      >Remember the Iberians were there! The Japanese constructed fairly modern
                      >(for the time) vessels toward the end of the sixteenth and the begining
                      >of the seventeenth centuries.
                      >
                      >
                      Japanese merchant vessels (at least to 1619) were limited to 250 koku
                      capacity (approx. 52.25 cubic meters). So probably about 30 feet (10
                      meters) long max. Adequate but not very impressive.

                      It is also known that at least one of the ships Will Adams constructed
                      for Ieyasu was of "more than 100 tons" (G. Sansom, _History of Japan,
                      1334-1615_, n. p. 403). A bit more impressive but later!

                      According to my book on Japanese Merchant Shipping, Date Masamune
                      (1566-1636) built a ship in his own fief to send to Rome. I suspect it
                      was at least a partial copy of Chinese/Korean or European vessels. It
                      apparently reached Mexico also! It was probably quite decent sized.

                      >From: Ii Saburou <logan@...>
                      >
                      >
                      >If you look, there aren't easier pickings.
                      >
                      Especially for a folk who weren't really great sailors.

                      >Then Perry comes in his Black Ships and forcibly requires Japan to open
                      >its doors. Up and coming Japanese come to the realization that the world
                      >will come to them unless they learn to keep the world out, and they build
                      >up a Navy and Army that are able to dominate their section of the world,
                      >defeating both the Chinese and the Russians.
                      >
                      >
                      In a very short period of time too! In the mid 1880's they are about on
                      par with the US, which is less impressive than it sounds.

                      Jim Eckman
                    • Solveig
                      Noble Cousin! Greetings from Solveig! ... The Korean take on things is not so much that the Japanese naval forces stunk, but that the Korean naval forces were
                      Message 10 of 26 , Jan 6, 2005
                      • 0 Attachment
                        Noble Cousin!

                        Greetings from Solveig!

                        >I agree, this is a very important reason. They really didn't do so badly
                        >except that the Japanese naval forces stunk, this is not good for over
                        >the water invasions.

                        The Korean take on things is not so much that the Japanese naval forces
                        stunk, but that the Korean naval forces were really good. They do have a
                        point there. They had several turtles.

                        >In a very short period of time too! In the mid 1880's they are about on
                        >par with the US, which is less impressive than it sounds.

                        It's still doing fairly well. Shortly afterward, the Japanese take on the
                        Russians and win. The imperial navy mas modeled on the British navy and
                        the imperial army was modeled on the Prussian army. At the time, the
                        British was about the only real global navy. The Spanish were of course
                        in serious decline by this point and were dispatched by the Americans in
                        the Spanish-American War. The French Navy's fangs were pulled during the
                        Napoleonic Wars and the Germans were always a primarily continental power.

                        Equaling U.S. naval power during a period of projecting "manifest
                        destiny" overseas is significant. U.S. expatriots in Hawaii stage a
                        Coup d'Etat in 1893 and the Spanish American War was fought in 1898.
                        --

                        Your Humble Servant
                        Solveig Throndardottir
                        Amateur Scholar

                        +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                        | Barbara Nostrand, Ph.D. | Solveig Throndardottir, CoM, CoS, Fleur |
                        | deMoivre Institute | Carolingia Statis Mentis Est |
                        | mailto:nostrand@... | mailto:bnostran@... |
                        +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                        | Note. Many popular "free" email services are automatically routed to the |
                        | trash by my email filters. |
                        +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                      • Ii Saburou
                        ... Which is fairly well substantiated by the history of the region: The Korean kingdoms were the ones that seem to have been doing much of the coastal trade.
                        Message 11 of 26 , Jan 6, 2005
                        • 0 Attachment
                          On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Solveig wrote:

                          > The Korean take on things is not so much that the Japanese naval forces
                          > stunk, but that the Korean naval forces were really good. They do have a
                          > point there. They had several turtles.

                          Which is fairly well substantiated by the history of the region: The
                          Korean kingdoms were the ones that seem to have been doing much of the
                          coastal trade. It was Korean ships and crews that piloted the Mongols
                          over to Japan. I seem to recall it was even Korea that helped furnish the
                          tributary ships which made it down around the tip of Africa (and possibly
                          farther).

                          In fact, the Japanese invasion only really seems to have worked because
                          they caught the Koreans sleeping--they had no idea that an invasion was
                          coming, and after the Japanese landed it was too late. Once they realized
                          it, though, they played terrible havoc with the Japanese supply
                          lines--attributed as one of the main reasons for Japanese defeat on the
                          penninsula, iirc.

                          -Ii
                        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.