[SCA-JML] Re: kamon
- Noble Cousin!
Greetings from Solveig!
First. A good book on Japanese kamon is:
Daibukan vol. 1 by Hashimoto
everything through page 209 of this book is period.
>I'm no expert, but I've seen fuji in both the tomoe and lozengeWhat are you writing about here? I had a rather diffferent picture in
>shapes, as well as in annulo (looking like a wreath of fuji-flowers
>without the leaves) as fabric patterns on pre Edo fabrics. Yes, I
>know, not all fabric patterns were Kamon, but for Society purposes, a
>fabric pattern can prove that a particular motif was known in period
>and thus make a particular idea plausible, if not actually
>documentable as used for the item in question.
my mind. As I recall, three triangles in a pyramid with some sort of
frob in the middle between the triangles is what was being described.
A pyramid of three triangles is quite nice and dates to the early
Kamakura period. It's the frob in the middle that I am objecting to.
As I recall, I wrote saying that Japanese in period did not in general
marshal charges. I stand by that. Throwing in lots of different charges
is usually poor recreation in Europe, and it is even more to be avoided
in Japan. There are a few cases where charges are combined:
A mountain with a cloud
A particular sort of bird with bamboo
These have a unified concept and are not combinations of the sort
expressed by "Gules a rose argent and on a chief a tyger passant
No, the cloud and the mountain go together as do the bird and the bamboo.
They have an icongraphic connection which is not at all the case with
the tyger and the rose in the Anglo-Norman example.
The one real case of combining elements is when an ordinal (usually one)
is combined with some other charge. Here you have something like:
Three roundels one and two and in base the letter one.
which was used by a man named Watanabe. Or the following:
The letter one and in base three roundels one and two
which was used by a man called Nagai Iga no Kami
>What about three fuji forced into the triangular shape, the fuji-Please don't do that to fuji. If you want three fuji in a pyramid,
>triangles arranged with with their vertices together.
at least let the fuji be round. There are examples of three roundels
arranged one and two. For example, Matsu'ura had three roundels one
and two inside of an anulus. Putting a ring around things accounted
for no more than 50% of kamon in use ca 1600.
>The really cool designs where one object takes the shape of anotherPretty much all pre 1600 kamon are pretty straightforward. So, I'm
>can't be done. Personally, I gave up on the idea of a Kamon because
not sure of what you are looking at.
>That stated, I would ask is he interested in strict authenticity orI urge you to pick one of the two and forget about trying to combine them.
>looking for for something with a Japanese inspiration that references
>his Japanese family name (fuji) and the game he likes (Legend of
This urge to combine too many things is very common in the Society, but it
is just not the way that people did things in the middle ages.
>Only he can answer this question. It's all about degrees. HowThree triangles do not give you diptheria and they are easier to draw.
>authentic do you care to be? How important is authenticity on X topic
>compared to other factors, such as personal aesthetics, society
>rules, or finances? - Health and safety issues are a gimme:
>Authenticity comes dead last on those and no appologies should be
>expected or offered. Read the Authenticity list that's the first
>thing they say.
>Looking at the fuji-in-triangle (compare to fuji-in-tomoe) arrangedThumbing through daibukan I could find no evidence for arranging fuji
>with with their vertices together, the questions then become:
in a one two pattern or for squishing them into triangular shape. You
are free to do anything you want within the limits of law. However,
please do not expect me to say that what you are doing is either
period or particularly Japanese if you take the position that you
do not care about what the Japanese were actually doing four hundred
>Unsure, probably not. Triangles probably are. Fuji are, but fuji-in-Daibukan does not appear to have kamon which do this prior to 1600.
>triangle may not be appropriate. A good question would be "when are
>the first recorded appearances of non-geometric object A forced into
>the shape of geometric object B?" Once that question is answered, it
>answers the question of if the idea is appropriate to the time period
The series is arranged chronologicly. If you can find a copy at a
local research library, then you can do your own research. The last
applicable page in the book is Vol 1 page 209. The page number is
written in kanji.
>Authenticity Question 2: : Assuming high authenticity for kamon, isIf you mean distorting fuji into a triangular shape, then I would say no.
>fuji-in-triangle apporprate to any pre-Edo Japanese armory at all?
>Unsure. It's possible, but I don't have the data to answer thatThe big revolution in kamon took place during the Meiji period
>question. It seems like the Edo opened up Japan culturally and alot
>of new things were tried and passed into "traditional" from that
>point on. Answering the dating question on non-geometric object into
>geometric shape would answer this question.
(post 1868) not the Edo period.
>Authenticity Question 3: Is an original Kamon a high priority, alongI still have no idea what the "triforce" is. If it is registered by
>with authenticity is? If not then is the triforce itself protected
>armory for the SCA due to prestige or someone else in the society
>actually registering it?
someone in the Society in the colour pattern you desire, then it is
taken. If not, then it is up for grabs. The College of Arms no longer
pays attention to comic book or video game characters.
>Laurel would need documentation for the use of that symbol in periodHashimoto. Daibukan Vol I page 8. Akibashi &al ca 1192 CE.
>Japanese armory to try to avert the bounce for modernity from
Your Humble Servant
| Barbara Nostrand, Ph.D. | Solveig Throndardottir, CoM, CoS |
| deMoivre Institute | Carolingia Statis Mentis Est |
| mailto:nostrand@... | mailto:bnostran@... |
| Note. Many popular "free" email services are automatically routed to |
| the trash by my email filters. |
- Thanks, I'll see what I can find.
--- Solveig <nostrand@...> wrote:
> Thank you for offering. I will see about scanning in=====
> my copy of the
> title page. This is not the sort of book which has a
> decorative cover.
> You need to go by what it says on the spine. It is
> part of a multi-
> volume set.
Check out "Cowboy" Bob's Books & Things at:
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!