45[SCA-JML] Re: tv show or movie????
- Oct 10, 1999On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Anthony J. Bryant wrote:
> "some" doesn't matter. Corpora says "make an attempt at preI never said I *agreed* with those "some"...
> seventeenth-century costume." Deliberately recreating something that
> didn't even appear until AFTER that cutoff is to me a complete disregard
> of the rules.
> Plus the fact that their whole design is post period both in fact and inYes, certainly. I never said that we should recreate non-period things. I
> concept. Nagabakama were developed for a reason, and that reason wasn't
> something that was part of sengoku or feudal Japanese life. The thing
> is, these garments are SYMBOLIC of the Edo period, and should not be
> used in the SCA. They had analogues that DID exist in period, and are
> symbolic of THAT era, and it is those that should be recreated.
was just saying that while the clothing protrayed in the series might get
*close* to period, they weren't documentable *as* period, and shouldn't be
used as a model for SCA use.
> > Sheesh! Nit pickers! :-}At least provide a towel!
> PPPFFFFTTTHHHH!!! <G>
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>