43[SCA-JML] Re: tv show or movie????
- Oct 10, 1999On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Anthony J. Bryant wrote:
> > rather hard to document the kamishimo to SCA period - as in right postWell, wouldn't you say 1620 is "right post period", in the larger scheme of
> > period but no records (available) to show it was *in* period.
> Akimoya-dono, how could you say such a thing? <G>
> The nagabakama the men wear at court (the LOOOOONG hakama) are post
> period, as are the folded, starched and winged kataginu that they wear.
> These are the two most recognizable items of samurai official wear, and
> they didn't appear until around 1620-50. It's VERY post period. Much of
> the other gear is period, but do NOT rely on clothing you see in Edo era
> films, as certain trends had developed which were markedly modern and
> not period.
things? I didn't say 1601 on the dot. It might even be considered *in*
period, if, according to some, period stretches to 1650...
Sheesh! Nit pickers! :-}
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>