- Oct 27, 2004Well Mullins, you raise an interesting point... But, saying that the group is "censured"
because it is moderated to remove spam is a bit like saying that banning pornography
from kindergarten classrooms is violation of the first amendment. Just a (somewhat
In either case, your point is well taken. I never intended (or wanted) to `moderate' the
group for spam. But, the reality is that we started to get it. I posted about the problem,
and the few people that did respond suggested that the group be moderated. I'll do
whatever the group prefers. I'm not sure if you looked at the group's posting history, but
you are the first person to post in over three months. The group is slow going at this
point. I really don't want to lose any of the few group participants we have because of
recurring penis enlargement spams. If you have any ideas (or if anyone has any ideas) on
how to best serve the group while solving spam concerns, please pass them on. For now,
I'm the only person we've got to ensure "that no ones voice is stifled." And I promise your
voice won't be stifled unless you're touting the benefits of boob cream, hot teens who
want me, or mortgage refinancing. But...uh... if the hot teens really DO want me, send me
an e-mail ASAP.
Anyway, thanks for the photos and links. Keep em coming. And special thanks for
resurrecting discussion. Anything specific to say about Rushdie or his works?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "finaldraft2000"
> I understand the problem the group has been having with spam lately.
> Still, does anyone find it a little ironic that messages are vetted
> (moderated). Surely Rushdie would laugh. A group dedicated to one of
> the staunchest supporters of free speech is censored. Mind you, I'm
> not complaining, but perhaps there are other solutions. Is there a
> we can maintain the spirit of what Rushdie stands for while keepingAny
> spammers at bay; or is spam a price to be paidallowing it,
> tolerating it, and thereby ensuring that no ones voice is stifled?
> thoughts or dissenting opinions?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>