Re: SkipDays [was: Feed Validator]
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Phil Ringnalda <philringnalda@...>
> As Sam says, this is a simple binary decision: either repeating a dayI think the double-day, double-hour use case falls into the area of
> or an hour is an error, and producers must not do it because consumers
> will explode, or it is not an error, and producers must not explode.
"not a good idea, but not enough of a bad idea to require a SHOULD NOT
in the spec."
There are a lot of inadvisable uses that the spec could cover, like a
100,000-character item description, 20,000-item channel, or a ttl set
I'd hate to see us get too bogged down in this when there are bigger
day-to-day issues for implementers. Can we table this use case for the
moment? I'll add it to the to-do list, which I'll be publishing with
the next draft.